ReviewFoods (Basel, Switzerland)2025
Application of Machine Learning in Food Safety Risk Assessment.
Review in Foods (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Sustainable smart sensing and AI-driven platforms for real-time detection and monitoring of mycotoxins across the food supply chain.Mycotoxin research · 2026Pooled it
- A Scoping Review and Risk Assessment of Aflatoxin B1 Contamination in Rice, Maize, and Peanut-Based Products Across Selected ASEAN Countries.Foods (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Trends in Vibrational Spectroscopy: NIRS and Raman Techniques for Health and Food Safety Control.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Recent Applications of Machine Learning Algorithms for Pesticide Analysis in Food Samples.Foods (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Next-Generation Strategies for Controlling Foodborne Pathogens: Precision Antimicrobials, Biofilm Disruption, and Emerging Molecular Interventions.Foods (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
With the increasing globalization of supply chains, ensuring food safety has become more complex, necessitating advanced approaches for risk assessment. This study aims to review the transformative role of machine learning (ML) and deep learning (DL) in enabling intelligent food safety management by efficiently analyzing high-quality and nonlinear data. We systematically summarize recent advances in the application of ML and DL, focusing on key areas such as biotoxin detection, heavy metal contamination, analysis of pesticide and veterinary drug residues, and microbial risk prediction. While traditional algorithms including support vector machines and random forests demonstrate strong performance in classification and risk evaluation, unsupervised methods such as K-means and hierarchical cluster analysis facilitate pattern recognition in unlabeled datasets. Furthermore, novel DL architectures, such as convolutional neural networks, recurrent neural networks, and transformers, enable automated feature extraction and multimodal data integration, substantially improving detection accuracy and efficiency. In conclusion, we recommend future work to emphasize model interpretability, multi-modal data fusion, and integration into HACCP systems, thereby supporting intelligent, interpretable, and real-time food safety management.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.