Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41376109›Full record

ReviewCurrent opinion in pulmonary medicine2026

Artificial intelligence in quantitative chest imaging analysis for occupational lung disease: appraisal of its current status.

Narufumi Suganuma, Taro Tamura, Masamitsu Eitoku

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Current opinion in pulmonary medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Narufumi SuganumaDepartment of Environmental Medicine, Kochi Medical School, Kohasu, Oko-cho, Nankoku, Japan.
Taro Tamura
Masamitsu Eitoku

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purpose of reviewThe application of mathematical algorithms for detecting lung abnormalities has been a challenge for decades. Occupational lung diseases, which often present as diffuse abnormalities, are primarily screened and diagnosed using chest radiographs and computed tomography (CT). This article reviews recent algorithmic advancements applied to these diagnostic tasks. RECENT

findingsSignificant progress has been made in artificial intelligence (AI) technologies, particularly with three-dimensional deep learning models based on convolutional neural networks (CNNs). For chest radiographs, promising approaches include the "eTóraxLaboral" platform for pneumoconiosis detection, CNNs enhanced with dark channel prior-inspired lesion area enhancement, and CNNs paired with CycleGAN. For CT imaging, transformer-based factorized encoders (TBFE), various CNN architectures (often combined with other techniques), and the recently developed Kolmogorov-Arnold Networks (KANs) for binary classification have shown strong performance. However, both chest radiograph and CT studies commonly rely on the International Labour Organization (ILO) International Classification of Radiographs of Pneumoconioses system (ILO/ICRP) for pneumoconiosis as a reference, which may limit AI development for CT in particular. SUMMARY: Recent advancements offer strong promise for computer-assisted diagnosis of pneumoconiosis using chest radiographs and CT scans. The standardization and integration of these technologies - especially with support from international organizations and collaborative studies - will be critical to achieving accurate, implementable screening tools for occupational lung disease.

Indexed as

Artificial IntelligenceLung DiseasesOccupational DiseasesPneumoconiosisRadiography, ThoracicAlgorithmsDeep LearningHumansNeural Networks, ComputerTomography, X-Ray Computedartificial intelligenceclassificationconvolutional neural networkpneumoconiosis

Identifiers

PMID41376109
PMCPMC12863620

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.