ReviewCurrent opinion in pulmonary medicine2026
Artificial intelligence in quantitative chest imaging analysis for occupational lung disease: appraisal of its current status.
Review in Current opinion in pulmonary medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Global research landscape versus disease burden in pneumoconiosis diagnosis: a dual-source bibliometric analysis [1999-2025].Journal of thoracic disease · 2026Article
- AI-Driven Automated Detection of Pleural Plaques on Chest CT Scans in Retired Asbestos-Exposed Workers.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purpose of reviewThe application of mathematical algorithms for detecting lung abnormalities has been a challenge for decades. Occupational lung diseases, which often present as diffuse abnormalities, are primarily screened and diagnosed using chest radiographs and computed tomography (CT). This article reviews recent algorithmic advancements applied to these diagnostic tasks. RECENT
findingsSignificant progress has been made in artificial intelligence (AI) technologies, particularly with three-dimensional deep learning models based on convolutional neural networks (CNNs). For chest radiographs, promising approaches include the "eTóraxLaboral" platform for pneumoconiosis detection, CNNs enhanced with dark channel prior-inspired lesion area enhancement, and CNNs paired with CycleGAN. For CT imaging, transformer-based factorized encoders (TBFE), various CNN architectures (often combined with other techniques), and the recently developed Kolmogorov-Arnold Networks (KANs) for binary classification have shown strong performance. However, both chest radiograph and CT studies commonly rely on the International Labour Organization (ILO) International Classification of Radiographs of Pneumoconioses system (ILO/ICRP) for pneumoconiosis as a reference, which may limit AI development for CT in particular. SUMMARY: Recent advancements offer strong promise for computer-assisted diagnosis of pneumoconiosis using chest radiographs and CT scans. The standardization and integration of these technologies - especially with support from international organizations and collaborative studies - will be critical to achieving accurate, implementable screening tools for occupational lung disease.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.