ArticleVeterinary and comparative oncology2026
A Comparative Study of Melanocytic Tumours: Linking Portuguese Dogs and Cats to Human Cases.
Article in Veterinary and comparative oncology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Development and Preliminary Psychometric Evaluation of a Melanoma Risk, Knowledge and Protective Behavior Questionnaire for Serbian Patients.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- A Comparative Study of Melanocytic Tumours: Linking Portuguese Dogs and Cats to Human Cases.Veterinary and comparative oncology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Melanocytic tumours (MT) occur in both humans and companion animals, presenting an opportunity for comparative oncology research. Thus, this study provides a comprehensive epidemiological analysis comparing MT in Portuguese dogs, cats and humans. Data were obtained from the Portuguese National Cancer Registry (RON) (2011-2021) and Vet-OncoNet (2020-2023), utilising standardised oncological classification systems (ICD-O-3.2 and Vet-ICD-O-canine-1). The results indicate that Melanoma was the most frequently diagnosed MT across all three species, while melanocytomas were common in dogs but rare in cats and humans. A higher incidence rate (IR) for MT was observed in dogs (IR = 16.1) compared to humans (IR = 8.1) and cats (IR = 6.3), and neutered dogs (10.8 years) were diagnosed at significantly older ages than intact ones (9.9 years). Shar-Peis (RR = 14.2, p < 0.001) had the highest RR compared to mixed-breed dogs, followed closely by Rhodesian Ridgebacks (RR = 12.2, p < 0.001) and Golden Retrievers (RR = 6.4, p < 0.001). Spatial analysis revealed significant clustering of MT cases in humans and dogs, with a strong geographical overlap (BLISA = 0.345, p < 0.001) in urban regions. This study provides the first epidemiological comparison of MT in these three species in Portugal, underscoring the sentinel role of companion animals in human oncology and the relevance of comparative oncology in translational cancer research.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.