SynthesisJournal of traditional Chinese medicine = Chung i tsa chih ying wen pan2025
Key elements for screening kidney deficiency pattern in Traditional Chinese and Korean Medicine: a systematic review and Delphi study.
Synthesis in Journal of traditional Chinese medicine = Chung i tsa chih ying wen pan, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveTo identify key elements for screening kidney deficiency pattern (KDP) through a systematic review and Delphi methodology to detect high-risk KDP groups.
methodsWe first conducted a systematic review to extract kidney system patterns and then performed four rounds of the Delphi. After the third round, two face-to-face consensus meetings were held to finalize the consensus. The English version of the KDP Screening Questionnaire (KDPScreenQ) was developed through agreement between a bilingual physician and the research team.
resultsA systematic review identified 35 studies that predominantly focused on KDP, KDP-
conclusionThe KDPScreenQ is a fundamental tool for standardizing KDP differentiation, serving both to screen patients with KDP and to track their long-term prognosis. This questionnaire will next be used in a prospective observational study to determine cut-off values.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.