ArticleAcute and critical care2025
Thoracic fluid content by electrical cardiometry versus diaphragmatic excursion by ultrasound for the prediction of weaning success in patients with lung congestion.
Article in Acute and critical care, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundPredicting the weaning outcomes is critical, since premature or delayed extubation is associated with an increased risk of mortality. This study aimed to compare two physiological indices, thoracic fluid content (TFC) and diaphragmatic excursion (DE), for predicting weaning success in mechanically ventilated patients.
methodsThis observational cohort study involved 100 mechanically ventilated patients with congested lungs who were eligible for weaning. Patients' TFC and DE were measured using electrical cardiometry and ultrasonography, respectively, before starting the spontaneous breathing trial. Following extubation, patients were grouped into successful and failed-weaning groups, with failure defined as reintubation or a need for non-invasive ventilation within 48 hours. Respiratory and cardiovascular variables were compared. The receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve was used to assess the ability of TFC and DE to predict weaning success.
resultsSuccessful weaning occurred in 73 patients (73%) and failed weaning occurred in 27 patients (27%). The two groups' baseline characteristics were comparable; however, TFC and DE were significantly different between the failed- and successful-weaning groups (P<0.001). The area under the ROC curve (AUC) exhibited moderate predictive abilities of both the TFC and DE in predicting weaning success (AUC, 0.805, cutoff <40 kΩ-1 and AUC, 0.774, cutoff >1.45 cm). In the cardiac patient subgroup, TFC exhibited high predictive ability (AUC, 0.861), but DE did not achieve comparable results (AUC, 0.750).
conclusionsBoth TFC and DE are significant predictors for successful weaning from mechanical ventilators. In particular, a TFC of <40 kΩ-1 demonstrated an excellent ability to predict weaning success in patients with low ejection fraction.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.