ReviewHypertension (Dallas, Tex. : 1979)2026
Cuffless Devices for the Measurement of Blood Pressure: A Scientific Statement From the American Heart Association.
Review in Hypertension (Dallas, Tex. : 1979), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed.
- Disparities in Blood Pressure Measurement.Current hypertension reports · 2026Review
- Pearls and pitfalls of noninvasive continuous arterial blood pressure monitoring.Canadian journal of anaesthesia = Journal canadien d'anesthesie · 2026Article
- Resistance training in older adults: are the gains worth the strain?American journal of preventive cardiology · 2026Article
- Consumer Smartwatch Technology in Health and Performance Research: Validity, Limitations, and Real-World Applications.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Wearable devices in the management of hypertension: Navigating the intersection between digital advancement and evidence-based practice.Clinical medicine (London, England) · 2026Review
- Evaluation of physiology-based models for noninvasive blood pressure estimation using pulse arrival time.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Social Vulnerability and Subclinical Cardiovascular Risk in Obstructive Sleep Apnea.Research square · 2026Article
- Utility of the US Metabolic Syndrome Severity Calculator for Group-Level Comparison in Estonia.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2026Article
- Identifying barriers to the acceptability and adoption of ambulatory blood pressure monitoring and proposed strategies in Bangladesh, Pakistan, and Sri Lanka: a qualitative study.BMC health services research · 2026Article
- Apple Watch for Hypertension Screening.Hypertension (Dallas, Tex. : 1979) · 2026Article
- Wearable, cuffless, and portable devices for blood pressure monitoring (2015-2025): a scoping review of technologies, calibration, clinical validation, and regulatory frameworks.Frontiers in digital health · 2026Article
- Continuous assessment and research on enhanced blood pressure control - CareBP study.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Conventional cuff-based blood pressure (BP) monitoring has several limitations, including patient discomfort with arm cuff inflation, inconvenience, and limited frequency of readings. Cuffless BP devices, which are increasingly available for purchase on the international market, have the potential to remove barriers to BP measurement in both research and clinical care. However, there are unanswered questions on whether, how, and in what settings these devices may be appropriate for use. Gaps include the need to understand whether the somewhat distinctive and often enormous volume of readings obtained by these devices have meaningful relationships with clinical outcomes and are appropriate for determining actionable interventions. Furthermore, international standards for determining the accuracy of some, but not yet all, of these devices only recently became available and do not provide a full assessment of the typical use of the devices. Thus, the devices on the market have not yet been adequately vetted for accuracy and efficacy. Several of these devices, however, have been cleared by the US Food and Drug Administration and are being used clinically. Moreover, many patients use cuffless devices for BP self-monitoring, often without disclosing this information to health care professionals. This scientific statement provides an overview of the existing literature on cuffless BP monitoring technologies and their potential future applications, and stresses the importance of understanding the gaps that need to be filled before these devices can be used clinically, recognizing that currently available devices may be inappropriate for clinical use.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.