Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41376999›Full record

ArticleJournal of thoracic disease2025

Performance evaluation of deep learning-based osteoporosis diagnostic models with conventional chest X-ray in a clinical cohort.

Bona Koo, Yelin Roh, Gyubin Shin, Yujin Yang, Rena Lee, Sungho Cho, So Hyun Ahn, Kwan-Chang Kim

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of thoracic disease, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Bona KooSchool of Medicine, Ewha Womans University, Seoul, South Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0003-7006-2231
Yelin RohSchool of Medicine, Ewha Womans University, Seoul, South Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0006-2059-4848
Gyubin ShinSchool of Medicine, Ewha Womans University, Seoul, South Korea.
Yujin YangSchool of Medicine, Ewha Womans University, Seoul, South Korea.
Rena LeeDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, College of Medicine, Ewha Womans University, Seoul, South Korea.
Sungho ChoREMEDI Research and Development Center, Seoul, South Korea.
So Hyun AhnEwha Medical Research Institute, School of Medicine, Ewha Womans University, Seoul, South Korea.
Kwan-Chang KimDepartment of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, School of Medicine, Ewha Womans University, Seoul, South Korea.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) is the gold standard for diagnosing osteoporosis; however, its limited accessibility often hinders routine screening in primary care settings. To address this gap, we developed and evaluated a deep learning-based model, PROS Methods: This retrospective study included 80 adult patients who underwent both DXA and chest radiography within a 3-month interval. The deep learning model, based on convolutional neural networks and trained via transfer learning, generated osteoporosis predictions from chest X-rays. Model performance was assessed against DXA-derived T-scores of the femur and lumbar spine, using either the minimum or average T-score per site as the reference standard. Results: The proposed model achieved an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.94 for femur and 0.93 for lumbar spine predictions. For osteoporosis screening, the sensitivity and specificity were 90% and 81%, respectively. Subgroup analysis demonstrated higher predictive performance in female patients, whereas false-positives (FPs) occurred more frequently in males. Conclusions: The PROS

Indexed as

artificial intelligence (AI)Chest X-raydeep learningearly diagnosisosteoporosis

Identifiers

PMID41376999
PMCPMC12688546

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.