ArticleEvolutionary applications2025
Pelagic Larval Duration and Isolation by Distance in Coastal Species.
Article in Evolutionary applications, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Pelagic Larval Duration and Isolation by Distance in Coastal Species.Evolutionary applications · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Dispersal among populations is crucial both for demographic stability and for the evolutionary potential of species. In marine organisms, dispersal has been shown to be prevalent during pelagic early life stages. Consequently, pelagic larval duration (PLD) has been proposed as an important driver of gene flow in marine species and is influencing genetic differentiation among populations. Despite this prediction, empirical studies have often failed to find the expected correlation between PLD and genetic metrics of gene flow. This could mean either that PLD is a poor predictor of gene flow or that differences in methodology, oceanography or sampling design across studies obscure the underlying mechanisms of gene flow. In the present study, we address these issues by using a consistent sampling design for 10 coastal species with previously published genetic data (ddRAD and microsatellites), and that differ in PLD. We investigate gene flow using an isolation-by-distance (IBD) model with pairwise
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.