ArticleJournal of dental anesthesia and pain medicine2025
Physiological and psychomotor effectiveness of rapid and slow induction of nitrous oxide inhalation sedation in pediatric patients undergoing dental procedures: a randomized clinical study.
Article in Journal of dental anesthesia and pain medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- The Efficacy and Safety of Intranasal Dexmedetomidine Spray Followed by Nitrous Oxide for Paediatric Oral Procedures.International dental journal · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Nitrous oxide-oxygen (N Methods: A total of 78 children who met the inclusion criteria were randomly divided into three groups: Group A (conventional slow induction), Group B (rapid induction with 30:70 N Results: All groups maintained vital signs within normal limits. Differences in pain perception and psychomotor impairment were statistically non-significant. A statistically significant difference was observed in the sedation levels among the groups (P = 0.033). Light sedation was achieved in 69.23%, 57.69%, and 73.08% of participants in Groups A, B, and C, respectively, while moderate sedation was observed in 19.23% of participants in the 50:50 induction group. A 24-hour telephonic follow-up revealed that all children had resumed normal activities and daily routines. Conclusion: The results provide clinicians with evidence-based guidance on N
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.