Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41377329›Full record

ReviewAnnals of medicine and surgery (2012)2025

Immunohematologic parallels and paradoxes: Africa vs Russia in the HIV era- a narrative review.

Emmanuel Ifeanyi Obeagu

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Annals of medicine and surgery (2012), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Emmanuel Ifeanyi ObeaguDepartment of Biomedical and Laboratory Science, Africa University, Zimbabwe.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4538-0161

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Human Immunodeficiency Virus (HIV) infection significantly impacts the immune system, often resulting in various hematological complications, including anemia, neutropenia, and thrombocytopenia. These cytopenias are influenced by several factors, including the direct effects of HIV on the bone marrow and the side effects of antiretroviral therapy. However, there are notable ethnoracial differences in the immunohematological profiles of HIV-infected individuals, particularly between African and Russian populations. Africa, with its high prevalence of co-infections such as malaria, tuberculosis, and helminthiasis, presents unique challenges in managing HIV-related cytopenias. In contrast, in Russia, chronic comorbidities such as hepatitis and alcohol use significantly influence the immune and hematological responses to HIV. These differences underline the importance of considering both genetic and environmental factors when diagnosing and managing HIV-related hematological disorders. While both regions face substantial HIV burdens, the immunohematologic outcomes differ considerably due to regional co-morbidities and genetic predispositions. In Africa, malaria and helminth infections frequently exacerbate anemia, neutropenia, and thrombocytopenia, while in Russia, liver diseases, alcohol use, and chronic viral infections contribute to myelosuppression and hematological abnormalities. Moreover, certain genetic factors, such as Benign Ethnic Neutropenia in African populations, complicate the interpretation of hematological data. These disparities necessitate region-specific approaches to diagnosis, treatment, and management, tailored to address the unique challenges posed by each population's distinct disease environment and health care system.

Indexed as

ARTcytopeniasethnoracial differencesHIVimmunohematology

Identifiers

PMID41377329
PMCPMC12688883

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.