ReviewAnnals of medicine and surgery (2012)2025
Health equity in sickle cell disease: overcoming barriers to care in marginalized communities.
Review in Annals of medicine and surgery (2012), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Exercise in Sickle Cell Disease: The Impact on Pathophysiology and Clinical Symptoms.Children (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Newborn Screening for Hemoglobinopathies and Thalassemias: Brief History, Recent Activities, and Global Status-2026.International journal of neonatal screening · 2026Review
- Strategies and innovations in hypertension management for sickle cell patients: A narrative review.Medicine · 2026Review
- Sickle cell disease 115 years later: improving health outcomes through policy, research, and collaboration, to achieve health equity.Frontiers in health services · 2026Article
- Deep vein thrombosis as a public health priority: wHO's agenda for Africa 2030.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Sickle cell disease (SCD) is one of the most prevalent inherited blood disorders globally, disproportionately affecting populations of African, Mediterranean, Middle Eastern, and South Asian ancestry. Despite advances in newborn screening, disease-modifying therapies, and curative interventions, profound disparities persist in diagnosis, treatment access, and survival outcomes. This narrative review examines the structural, socioeconomic, and healthcare barriers to equitable SCD care in marginalized communities and synthesizes policy-relevant strategies to overcome these obstacles. A structured narrative review was conducted by searching PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, CINAHL, and Google Scholar for literature published between 2010 and 2025. Peer-reviewed articles, policy briefs, and global health reports addressing SCD and health equity were included, with thematic synthesis used to identify key barriers and interventions. Evidence reveals that poverty, inadequate health infrastructure, systemic racism, stigma, and fragmented care systems remain major drivers of inequity. Limited access to newborn screening, hydroxyurea, transfusion programs, and curative therapies perpetuates preventable morbidity and mortality, particularly in sub-Saharan Africa and underserved diaspora communities. Promising interventions include universal newborn screening, community-based education, task-sharing with trained health workers, equitable research funding, and integration of telemedicine to improve specialist access. Health equity in SCD requires more than biomedical innovation. Sustainable progress depends on dismantling structural barriers, strengthening healthcare systems, and implementing policies that prioritize social determinants of health. Coordinated global and local action can transform SCD care from a paradigm of persistent disparity into a model of equitable, patient-centered outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.