ArticleNutrition research and practice2025
Comparison of nutritional status between adults with and without disabilities: a population-based cross-sectional study in South Korea.
Article in Nutrition research and practice, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
BACKGROUND/
objectivesThere has been a notable lack of effort to evaluate the nutritional status of persons with disabilities objectively and identify their nutritional challenges. This study aimed to assess whether nutritional inadequacies and imbalances are more pronounced in persons with disabilities compared to those without, using data from the 6th Korea National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (2013). SUBJECTS/
methodsThe participants were classified into 387 persons with disabilities and 4,909 without disabilities. The 15 types of disabilities were categorized into 5 groups, and disability severity was classified as severe or mild. Nutrient intake and nutritional status were assessed using 24-h dietary recall data.
resultsCompared to persons without disabilities, those with disabilities had significantly lower nutrient adequacy ratios for 8 of 10 nutrients, the exceptions being vitamins B1 and C (all
conclusionPersons with disabilities faced significant nutritional inadequacies and imbalances compared to those without disabilities. Targeted nutrition interventions and disability-inclusive nutrition policies and practices are urgently needed to reduce these disparities.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.