ReviewCirculation reports2025
Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation in Acute Cardiovascular Care.
Review in Circulation reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) delivers powerful mechanical circulatory support while simultaneously offering respiratory support; however, it can increase afterload and is associated with potential device-related vascular complications. To date, several randomized controlled trials have failed to demonstrate a prognostic benefit of routine use of ECMO in patients with cardiogenic shock secondary to acute myocardial infarction or in those with out-of-hospital cardiac arrest. Therefore, the routine use of ECMO is not a guideline-recommended therapeutic strategy. However, in real-world clinical practice, a considerable proportion of patients with cardiogenic shock and cardiac arrest have no other therapeutic options besides ECMO to save their life. Additionally, a combination of ECMO with other mechanical circulatory support devices, such as an intra-aortic balloon pump and percutaneous ventricular assist device, may help reduce the limitations of ECMO and improve patient outcomes. The results of ongoing randomized trials will shape our understanding of the role of ECMO itself and the combination strategies in patients with cardiogenic shock and out-of-hospital cardiac arrest.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.