Evidence mapPaperPMID 41377629Full record

ReviewCirculation reports2025

Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation in Acute Cardiovascular Care.

Kazuya Tateishi, Yuichi Saito, Ken Kato, Hideki Kitahara, Yoshio Kobayashi

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Circulation reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Kazuya TateishiDepartment of Cardiovascular Medicine, Chiba University Graduate School of Medicine Chiba Japan.
Yuichi SaitoDepartment of Cardiovascular Medicine, Chiba University Graduate School of Medicine Chiba Japan.
Ken KatoDepartment of Cardiovascular Medicine, Chiba University Graduate School of Medicine Chiba Japan.
Hideki KitaharaDepartment of Cardiovascular Medicine, Chiba University Graduate School of Medicine Chiba Japan.
Yoshio KobayashiDepartment of Cardiovascular Medicine, Chiba University Graduate School of Medicine Chiba Japan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) delivers powerful mechanical circulatory support while simultaneously offering respiratory support; however, it can increase afterload and is associated with potential device-related vascular complications. To date, several randomized controlled trials have failed to demonstrate a prognostic benefit of routine use of ECMO in patients with cardiogenic shock secondary to acute myocardial infarction or in those with out-of-hospital cardiac arrest. Therefore, the routine use of ECMO is not a guideline-recommended therapeutic strategy. However, in real-world clinical practice, a considerable proportion of patients with cardiogenic shock and cardiac arrest have no other therapeutic options besides ECMO to save their life. Additionally, a combination of ECMO with other mechanical circulatory support devices, such as an intra-aortic balloon pump and percutaneous ventricular assist device, may help reduce the limitations of ECMO and improve patient outcomes. The results of ongoing randomized trials will shape our understanding of the role of ECMO itself and the combination strategies in patients with cardiogenic shock and out-of-hospital cardiac arrest.

Indexed as

Extracorporeal circulationResuscitationShock

Identifiers

PMID41377629
PMCPMC12688435

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.