ArticleCirculation reports2025
Budget Impact of Vericiguat for Treating Chronic Heart Failure in Japan.
Article in Circulation reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Chronic heart failure (CHF) affects millions worldwide, posing a significant burden on healthcare resources. For patients with HF with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) following a worsening event, vericiguat is a promising new treatment. In this study we evaluated the budgetary impact on Japan's health system with the introduction of vericiguat as an add-on to standard of care (SoC) for chronic HFrEF after a worsening event. Methods and Results: An economic model was developed comparing SoC to a scenario in which vericiguat is introduced as an add-on therapy over a 5-year time horizon. A literature review, medical claims data and clinical trial data were used to derive inputs. Total healthcare costs after introducing vericiguat were estimated to increase <1% over 5 years compared to the SoC scenario showing a cumulated budget impact of US$41,027,304. Increases were driven by drug and medical costs, but were partially offset by decreasing costs for hospitalizations, terminal care, and urgent HF visits. In the sensitivity analyses, the hospitalization rate had the largest effect on the overall budget impact. Conclusions: This analysis highlighted the minimal budgetary impact of vericiguat and its potential to reduce hospitalizations in Japan. Although drug and monitoring costs increased, reductions in acute care expenses helped offset these costs. Further research is needed on long-term cost-effectiveness and real-world outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.