ArticleJAC-antimicrobial resistance2025
Successful outpatient parenteral antimicrobial therapy with rezafungin for chronic pulmonary aspergillosis: a case report and health economic assessment.
Article in JAC-antimicrobial resistance, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Chronic pulmonary aspergillosis (CPA) is a serious lung disorder caused by Objectives: To report a case where rezafungin was potentially effective in managing CPA for a patient with limited treatment options, and to estimate the health economic impact of rezafungin versus once-daily echinocandin in an OPAT setting. Patients and methods: We discuss a patient with CPA, diagnosed in 2020, with frequent episodes of haemoptysis, dyspnoea, productive cough and lethargy with progressive bilateral pulmonary cavitatory lesions and nodules treated with rezafungin over 12 weeks via OPAT. Costs to deliver once-weekly rezafungin compared with once-daily caspofungin in the OPAT clinic were compared. Results: Symptoms improved significantly after 12 weeks of rezafungin, with no further emergency visits, versus eight in the year prior due to CPA symptoms. Aspergillus serology (IgG) improved and computerized tomography imaging showed slight improvement in the degree of consolidation surrounding the cavities. Daily OPAT costs increased by £13.71 for rezafungin compared with caspofungin. This was offset by greater patient convenience and improved OPAT clinic capacity. Conclusions: Rezafungin may be a novel, well-tolerated and cost-effective echinocandin treatment for CPA in patients needing OPAT and with limited treatment options. Further clinical studies are required for robust evaluation of this novel echinocandin in CPA.
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.