ArticleBJA open2025
Determining reduced functional capacity in older adults using research-grade wearable accelerometers: a secondary analysis of the study of muscle, mobility, and aging.
Article in BJA open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Reduced functional capacity (FC) is associated with adverse surgical outcomes in older adults. Current FC assessments rely on questionnaires; however, it remains unclear whether accelerometer-measured daily activity provides a more accurate evaluation. Our primary aim was to identify accelerometer-based variables associated with reduced FC. Methods: We conducted a secondary analysis of the Study of Muscle, Mobility and Aging (SOMMA) cohort. Participants were community-dwelling adults (non-surgical) aged ≥70 yr and recruited between the years 2019 to 2021 at the University of Pittsburgh (Pittsburgh, PA, USA) and Wake Forest University School of Medicine (Winston-Salem, NC, USA). Participants were included if they completed cardiopulmonary exercise testing and had valid wear time (≥3 days) for two accelerometers used in the SOMMA study (ActiGraph GT9X and activPAL4). We applied classification and regression tree and random forest models to accelerometry-derived metrics. For comparison, we constructed a logistic regression model using modified Duke Activity Status Index 4-Question (M-DASI-4Q) scores extrapolated from the Community Healthy Activities Model Program for Seniors questionnaire. Results: The final cohort included 640 participants (57.2% [366/640] women; mean age 76.3 [5.0] yr), of whom 18% (114/640) had reduced FC (peak oxygen uptake [VO Conclusion: Among community-dwelling older adults, daily step count and time in moderate-to-vigorous activity were most associated with FC, but the accelerometer-based model showed only fair discrimination to identify participants with reduced FC. Validation in surgical populations is needed.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.