Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41378021›Full record

ReviewTranslational cancer research2025

On the translational potential of atlases in precision oncology.

Lucrezia Zorzi, Lucia Casella, Marco Dominietto, Enrico Capobianco

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Translational cancer research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Lucrezia Zorzi *GateToBrain, Chiasso, Switzerland.
Lucia Casella *Department of Physics, University of Turin, Turin, Italy.
Marco DominiettoGateToBrain, Chiasso, Switzerland.
Enrico CapobiancoNUDDHA LLC, Lake Worth, FL, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The proliferation of publicly available imaging datasets, combined with widespread access to computational power, has boosted research in neuroscience, neurobiology, and systems biology while inspiring projects centered on building atlases. Atlases are methodological tools that provide global overviews of detailed thematic information, are usually organized in grids with assigned resolution to facilitate inference, and offer a reliable knowledge base from multimodal evidence data. Two critical goals have been generally addressed through atlases: (I) warehousing baseline information of normal anatomical structures under physiological (i.e., non-pathological) conditions; and (II) establishing a reference for typical anatomy across demographic groups by aggregating high-resolution imaging data that cover extensively diverse populations. Compared to more traditional atlases often referring to homogeneous groups of populations, the recent atlas developments have leveraged data multimodality and utilized machine learning (ML) and artificial intelligence (AI) tools for inference purposes. Together with the possibility of representing normal variation within specific demographic cohorts and gaining usability and reliability in clinical applications, data multimodality is particularly impactful in precision oncology and personalized therapy. This review discusses the translational potential of atlases in cancer studies through their property of integrating multiple types of cancer data and inspiring predictive learning algorithms that account for the correlations between anatomical and imaging features with genetic and omics markers.

Indexed as

Atlasesbrainmultimodal dataprecision oncologyradiomics

Identifiers

PMID41378021
PMCPMC12686143

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.