ReviewBiophysical reviews2025
Developing high-concentration monoclonal antibody formulations for subcutaneous administration to improve patient treatment.
Review in Biophysical reviews, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Article
- The Impact of Particle Properties on High Concentration Suspension Performance and Stability of Spray-Dried Monoclonal Antibodies.Pharmaceutical research · 2026Article
- Recent Advances in Particle Design for High-Concentration Protein Suspension Injectables.Pharmaceutics · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The transition of immunotherapy administration from intravenous infusion to subcutaneous (SC) administration of monoclonal antibody formulations for oncology patients has garnered significant interest. SC administration offers multiple benefits, including potential for at-home administration, enhanced patient compliance, reduced hospital congestion, lowered health care costs, and improved sustainability by reducing drug wastage and minimizing environmental impact. However, for many biologics, the shift to SC administration requires the development of high-concentration monoclonal antibody products (HCmAP) due to the need for large dose volumes. Here we explore the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on immunotherapy administration and the imperative of adopting SC administration. We discuss challenges encountered throughout the manufacturing, shipping, storage, and delivery of HCmAP. A central hurdle identified involves the biophysical instability and the large increase in viscosity of these biologics due to increased antibody concentration. Further complications can arise from "non-ideality" effects through molecular crowding or co-exclusion effects (macromolecules blocking the free movement in solution of other macromolecules) and elevated macromolecular interactions. For reducing the viscosity for a given concentration of antibody, the main excipients reported are salts and amino acids, with Arg-HCl demonstrating particularly improved formulation viscosity in an HCmAP. However, excipients with viscosity-lowering effects can also impact protein stability. The journey to discover suitable excipient strategies remains ongoing, combined with emerging approaches such as molecular engineering and computational techniques, with the ultimate aim of facilitating the successful integration of SC administration for economic savings, environmental sustainability, and social equity.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.