Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41378118›Full record

ReviewBiophysical reviews2025

Measuring molecular forces inside living cells using magnetic tweezers.

Abhinav Kongari, Maxim Molodtsov

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Biophysical reviews, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Biophysics in Great Britain and Ireland.Biophysical reviews · 2025
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Abhinav KongariThe Francis Crick Institute, London, NW1 1AT UK.
Maxim MolodtsovThe Francis Crick Institute, London, NW1 1AT UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

To change shape, move, grow and divide, cells employ various motor and non-motor proteins that convert chemical energy into the generation of mechanical force. Force spectroscopy tools that allow the measurement of these forces generated by individual molecules revolutionised our understanding of single-molecule mechanics over the past three decades. These techniques, however, remain largely confined to studies with purified components outside cells. A critical, unresolved challenge lies in deciphering how these force-generating and force-sensing molecules coordinate their activities inside living cells. In this review, we discuss advances in magnetic tweezers designed to measure and apply mechanical forces intracellularly. We highlight recent progress in magnetic tweezers that began to provide an understanding of how active mechanical forces drive rearrangements of biological structures. We also discuss challenges associated with applying forces locally and precisely. We identify two key areas that hold potential for the development of tools for direct mechanical manipulations of specific molecules inside living cells: (1) instrument design to generate and control magnetic gradients at the single-cell scale, and (2) development of magnetic biofunctionalised particles capable of targeting specific structures. The integration of these advances should enable unprecedented ability to manipulate intracellular forces, opening new avenues to study intracellular organisation, mechanotransduction pathways, cell division and migration. By addressing current limitations in specificity and resolution, next-generation magnetic tweezers may finally bridge the gap between single-molecule biophysics in vitro and cell-scale mechanobiology in living cells.

Indexed as

Cell mechanicsForce spectroscopyIntracellular force measurementMagnetic tweezersMechanical forcesMechanobiologySuperparamagnetic particles

Identifiers

PMID41378118
PMCPMC12686234

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.