ArticleFrontiers in science2025
Precision cardiovascular medicine: shifting the innovation paradigm.
Article in Frontiers in science, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- The Emerging Role of Mechanobiology in Connecting Metabolic and Cardiovascular Diseases: From Fundamentals to Future Therapies.Biomedicines · 2026Review
- Dynamic microRNA Signatures as Biomarkers for Cardiac Ischemia and Remodeling.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Article
- An Integrative Review of the Cardiovascular Disease Spectrum: Integrating Multi-Omics and Artificial Intelligence for Precision Cardiology.Diseases (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Precision cardiovascular medicine: global imperative for equity through innovation.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2026Article
- Editorial: Immunity, atherosclerosis, and cardiovascular disease: an interdisciplinary approach to cardiometabolic health.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
17 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Despite the development of potent drugs for modifiable risk factors and advances in mechanistic biomedical research, cardiovascular diseases (CVDs) collectively remain the leading cause of death globally, indicating a need for new, more effective therapies. A foundational challenge is the multilevel heterogeneity that characterizes CVDs-from their complex pathobiological mechanisms at the molecular and cellular levels, to their clinical presentations and therapeutic responses at the individual and population levels. This variability arises from individuals' unique genomic and exposomic characteristics, underscoring the need for precision approaches. Other key challenges include the long navigation times, high costs, and low success rates for drug development, often compounded by the poor "druggability" of new targets. In this article, we explore how these challenges have inspired novel technologies that offer promise in improving health outcomes globally through an integrative precision medicine approach. Key to this transformation is the use of systems biology and network medicine, whereby the application of artificial intelligence to "big data", ranging from clinical information to unbiased multiomics (e.g., genomics, transcriptomics, proteomics, and metabolomics) can elucidate disease mechanisms, yield novel biomarkers for disease progression, and identify potential drug targets. In parallel, new computational approaches are helping translate these discoveries into novel therapies and overcome druggability barriers. The transition to a precision-based research and innovation paradigm in cardiovascular medicine will require greater interdisciplinary collaboration, data science implementation at every stage, and new partnerships between academia and industry. Global policy leadership is also essential to implement suitable models of research funding and organization, data infrastructures and policies, medicines regulations, and patient access policies promoting equity.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.