Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41378291›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in oncology2025

Integrative modeling of FOXO-mediated autophagy in NSCLC: linking cGAS-STING signaling to IL-6 dynamics.

Divya Rani, Shweta Khandibharad, Shailza Singh

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in oncology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Divya RaniSystems Medicine Laboratory, Biotechnology Innovation and Research Council (BRIC)-National Centre for Cell Science, Pune, India.
Shweta KhandibharadSystems Medicine Laboratory, Biotechnology Innovation and Research Council (BRIC)-National Centre for Cell Science, Pune, India.
Shailza SinghSystems Medicine Laboratory, Biotechnology Innovation and Research Council (BRIC)-National Centre for Cell Science, Pune, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Lung cancer, particularly non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), remains the leading cause of cancer-related mortality worldwide, accounting for approximately 85% of lung cancer cases. Despite therapeutic advancements, the prognosis for advanced-stage NSCLC remains poor due to late diagnosis and high rates of therapeutic resistance. Recent studies have implicated the cyclic GMP-AMP synthase (cGAS)-stimulator of interferon genes (STING) pathway in NSCLC progression, revealing its dual role in innate immune activation and autophagy induction. Concurrently, cGAS-STING activation triggers noncanonical autophagy. We proposed a systems biology framework integrating mathematical model and network biology to elucidate how forkhead box class O (FOXOs) FOXO1 and FOXO3a serve as critical regulators linking cGAS-STING signaling with interleukin-6 (IL-6) in promoting autophagy in NSCLC. Furthermore, sequence, phylogeny, structure, domain, and protein-protein interaction studies identified crucial amino acids and their functions in regulating cGAS-STING- FOXO1 and cGAS-STING-FOXO3a interactions. Our integrative model highlights the complex interplay between immune signaling, metabolic reprogramming, and autophagic regulation in NSCLC. Further findings offer mechanistic insights into the dual role of FOXO proteins in autophagy mediated cancer progression and present potential components for the development of personalized therapeutic strategies aimed at targeting the cGAS-STING-FOXO-autophagy axis.

Indexed as

autophagyFOXO1FOXO3Amathematical modelnetwork biologySTING

Identifiers

PMID41378291
PMCPMC12685641

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.