ArticleInternational journal of general medicine2025
Predicting Early Dysphagia in Acute Ischemic Stroke Using an Explainable Machine Learning Model.
Article in International journal of general medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: This study aimed to identify key risk factors and develop an explainable machine learning (ML) model for predicting early dysphagia in patients with acute ischemic stroke (AIS). Patients and Methods: In this cross-sectional study, 1041 patients with AIS were recruited from two tertiary hospitals. Participants were classified into a non-dysphagia group (n = 736) and a dysphagia group (n = 305). Feature selection was carried out using the Boruta algorithm and logistic regression. The dataset was randomly partitioned into a training set (n = 728) and a test set (n = 313) in a 7:3 ratio. Six ML models were trained with 10-fold cross-validation. Model performance was evaluated based on the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC-ROC), sensitivity, specificity, accuracy,positive predictive value (PPV), negative predictive value (NPV), F1-score and Youden's index. Key predictors were interpreted using SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP) analysis. Results: The incidence of early dysphagia with AIS was 29.3%. The Random Forest (RF) model demonstrated the best overall performance, with an AUC-ROC of 0.952 (95% CI: 0.927-0.976). The significant risk factors identified were Activities of Daily Living (ADL) grade, National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) score, multifocal lesions, hypoalbuminemia, coronary heart disease, and lesion hemisphere. Conclusion: ML models may serve as reliable assessment tools for predicting dysphagia in patients with AIS. The RF model demonstrated the best predictive performance. This predictive model could assist clinical healthcare providers in delivering early warnings and developing individualized treatment plans for high-risk patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.