ReviewJournal of the American Heart Association2025
What Should a Clinical Cardiologist Know About Cardiogenetics?
Review in Journal of the American Heart Association, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Revisiting the Genetics of Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy: From Sarcomeres to Polygenic Modulation and Clinical Translation.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
16 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Inherited cardiovascular diseases are becoming increasingly prominent in clinical practice, significantly impacting diagnosis, risk assessment, and family screening strategies. Progress in genetic testing has broadened access to cardiogenetic evaluations, while also presenting new challenges in interpreting variants and incorporating findings into clinical care. This narrative review explores 20 essential questions that clinical cardiologists may face when dealing with suspected or confirmed inherited cardiac conditions. Organized as a practical, question-driven guide, it outlines when to consider a genetic cause, how to choose and interpret genetic tests, and how to manage patients regardless of their genetic test results. The review emphasizes variant classification based on American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics criteria, the importance of clinical context in interpreting uncertain results, and the principles behind family cascade screening. Particular attention is given to the management of relatives who carry a genetic variant but show no symptoms, and to the current limitations of genetic testing technologies (eg, performance). Ethical considerations, including the appropriate timing of testing in children minors, are also discussed. By connecting genetic insights with clinical cardiology, this review aims to support practical, informed decision making and promote effective collaboration with cardiogenetic specialists.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.