ArticleInternational urogynecology journal2026
Strategy of Delayed Midurethral Sling Surgery for Pelvic Organ Prolapse with Stress Urinary Incontinence after Laparoscopic Lateral Abdominal Wall Suspension.
Article in International urogynecology journal, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Disentangling Procedural and Patient-Specific Drivers of Perioperative Outcomes in Pelvic Organ Prolapse Surgery: A Stratified Multigroup Analysis.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introduction and hypothesisTo explore whether concurrent midurethral sling surgery (MUS) is necessary for pelvic organ prolapse (POP) patients with simple anatomical stress urinary incontinence (SUI) undergoing laparoscopic lateral abdominal wall suspension (LLS).
methodsA multicenter prospective cohort study enrolled 200 eligible patients (stage Ⅱ + apical/anterior POP with SUI) from 2022-2024, divided into LLS + MUS (n = 100) and LLS alone (n = 100), with 40 healthy controls. Outcomes included urodynamic tests, ISI, POP-Q, MRI, and PGI-I at baseline, 3 months, and 1 year.
results170 patients (85%) completed 1-year follow-up. LLS + MUS group had higher SUI cure rate (85.3% vs 50.9%, P < 0.05) but more complications (urinary tract infection:17.6% vs 5.9%; urinary retention:8.8% vs 0%; dyspareunia:35.3% vs 15.7%; mesh exposure:14.7% vs 2%, all P < 0.05). LLS alone group showed higher satisfaction (86.3% vs 67.6%, P < 0.05). POP anatomical reduction rates were similar between groups (P > 0.05).
conclusionsFor apical/anterior POP with SUI, LLS alone is preferred, with delayed MUS if needed, reducing complications and improving satisfaction.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41379165What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.