ArticleArquivos brasileiros de cardiologia2025
Handgrip Strength in Heart Failure: Developing a Reference Equation.
Article in Arquivos brasileiros de cardiologia, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- A Step Forward in the Assessment of Handgrip Strength in Heart Failure.Arquivos brasileiros de cardiologia · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundHandgrip strength (HGS) is a key indicator of overall muscle strength and functional capacity in patients with heart failure (HF). However, no reference equations specific to this population have been previously published.
objectivesThis study aimed to develop and validate a reference equation for predicting HGS in patients with HF.
methodsA cross-sectional study was conducted on patients with stable HF, aged 18-79 years, diagnosed for at least three months. Maximum HGS value was obtained from three consecutive measurements. Clinical data and anthropometric assessments were collected. The sample was randomly divided into two-thirds (n=174) for derivation and one third (n=100) for validation. A multivariate regression model was applied to develop the predictive equation, including variables with a p-value < 0.25 as determined by the Wald test.
resultsDerivation and validation samples showed no significant differences at baseline. Patients were predominantly male, older adults, and white. The derived equation was: Predicted HGS = -39.732 + (10.771 * gender [female = 0; male = 1]) - (0.158 * age [years]) + (35.096 * height [m]) + (0.448 * calf circumference [cm]) - (4.224 * the New York Heart Association class [I /II = 0; III/IV = 1]). When applied to the validation sample, the equation underestimated actual HGS by 0.68 ± 8.93 Kg.
conclusionAge, sex, height, calf circumference, and NYHA class were key determinants of HGS in HF patients. The derived equation showed good predictive accuracy and may serve as a useful reference for interpreting grip strength in this population.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.