ArticleJAMA network open2025
School Performance of Preterm-Born Children After Intraventricular Hemorrhage.
Article in JAMA network open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Beyond Maximum Haemorrhage Grade: Serial Cranial Ultrasound Phenotyping Refines Developmental Risk Stratification After Intraventricular Haemorrhage in Very Preterm Infants.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Article
- Severe neonatal complications and long-term health-related quality of life in very preterm and/or very low birth weight survivors: evidence from the Dutch Project on preterm and small for gestational age cohort.Quality of life research : an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Importance: Intraventricular hemorrhage (IVH) is a significant complication of preterm birth, affecting approximately 20% of preterm infants. Despite its prevalence, the effect of IVH beyond the impact of prematurity alone has been scarcely studied beyond early childhood, posing an important knowledge gap. Objective: To investigate the association of IVH with national school performance throughout childhood to adolescence. Design, Setting, and Participants: This population-based cohort study included all very preterm infants (<32 weeks' gestation) and full-term infants (≥37 weeks' gestation) born in New South Wales, Australia, between January 1, 2007, and December 31, 2013. Cohorts were very preterm children with low-grade (grades 1-2) or high-grade (grades 3-4) IVH, very preterm controls without IVH, and full-term controls. Analyses were conducted from January 30 to September 18, 2024. Exposure: IVH grade 1 to 4. Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary outcome was overall performance on standardized national school assessments at age 8 to 9, 10 to 11, and 12 to 13 years, including adjusted mean differences (AMDs) in z scores between children with IVH and very preterm controls. Secondary outcomes were domain-specific performance in reading, writing, spelling, grammar, and numeracy and whether children met the national minimum standards overall and for each domain. Academic trajectories were also compared by group. Results: This study included 408 189 children: 557 with low-grade IVH, 85 with high-grade IVH, 2557 very preterm controls without IVH, and 404 990 full-term controls. Children with low-grade IVH performed similarly to preterm controls at age 8 to 9 years (AMD in overall academic z score, -0.06; 95% CI, -0.14 to 0.03), 10 to 11 years (AMD, -0.09; 95% CI, -0.21 to 0.03), and 12 to 13 years (AMD, -0.04; 95% CI, -0.24 to 0.16). Children with grade 2 IVH (n = 145), however, performed significantly worse than very preterm controls at age 8 to 9 years (AMD, -0.20; 95% CI, -0.36 to -0.04). Children with high-grade IVH performed significantly worse than very preterm controls at age 8 to 9 years (AMD, -0.50; 95% CI, -0.71 to -0.30), 10 to 11 years (AMD, -0.59; 95% CI, -0.85 to -0.34), and 12 to 13 years (AMD, -0.61; 95% CI, -1.05 to -0.17). Numeracy was a consistently weak domain for children with high-grade IVH throughout school age (eg, at age 8 to 9 years, AMD in the numeracy z score compared with very preterm controls was -0.49 [95% CI, -0.70 to -0.28]). Differences in academic trajectories between groups remained fixed with increasing age; however, all groups showed improvement over time (eg, adjusted β for very preterm children, 32.3 [95% CI, 31.2-33.5]; children with low-grade IVH, 31.5 [95% CI, 29.0-34.0]; high-grade IVH, 30.2 [95% CI, 24.1-36.4]). Conclusions and Relevance: In this cohort study, the association of low-grade IVH with worse school performance appeared limited to children with grade 2 IVH. Children with high-grade IVH consistently showed poorer academic performance into adolescence than their peers born very preterm without IVH. Nevertheless, very preterm children, regardless of IVH grade, demonstrated academic progress over time, underscoring the need for ongoing educational support to help them to realize their full potential.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.