Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41379722›Full record

ReviewEuropean surgical research. Europaische chirurgische Forschung. Recherches chirurgicales europeennes2026

Immunotherapy for Solid Tumours: Current Clinical Landscape and Future Directions.

Aniek E van Diepen, Songul Kucukcelebi, Judith de Vos-Geelen, Nigel G Kooreman

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in European surgical research. Europaische chirurgische Forschung. Recherches chirurgicales europeennes, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Aniek E van DiepenDepartment of Surgery, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Songul KucukcelebiDepartment of Surgery, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Judith de Vos-GeelenDepartment of Internal Medicine, Section of Medical Oncology, GROW - Research Institute for Oncology and Reproduction, Maastricht University Medical Centre, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
Nigel G KooremanDepartment of Surgery, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, The Netherlands, n.kooreman@erasmusmc.nl.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundCancer immunotherapy has transformed the therapeutic landscape of oncology by harnessing the body's immune system to recognise and eliminate malignant cells. In certain tumour types, such as melanoma and non-small cell lung cancer, immune-based therapies have led to durable clinical responses and significantly improved survival. These successes have fuelled the rapid integration of immunotherapeutic approaches into standard treatment regimens. However, their effectiveness in the majority of solid tumours remains limited. Several biological and physical barriers underlie this limited efficacy. A major challenge is the immunosuppressive nature of the tumour microenvironment (TME), which hampers effective immune cell infiltration and function. In many solid tumours, chronic inflammation, poor antigen presentation, a low mutational burden, and the presence of suppressive myeloid and stromal cells create an environment resistant to immune activation. In addition, high intra-tumoral pressure and abnormal vasculature further restrict drug delivery and immune cell trafficking, particularly in desmoplastic cancers such as pancreatic and prostate cancer. SUMMARY: Recent advances in immuno-oncology have focused on strategies to overcome these barriers and convert "cold" tumours, those lacking immune cell infiltration, into "hot," immune-inflamed tumours. Despite this progress, clinical translation has proven to be complex, with mixed results across various tumour types. While some patients derive long-term benefit from immunotherapy, others exhibit primary or acquired resistance, underscoring the need for better patient stratification and predictive biomarkers. KEY MESSAGES: This review provides a comprehensive overview of the evolving field of immunotherapy for solid tumours, discussing key mechanisms of immune resistance, the role of the TME, and the multifactorial nature of therapeutic failure. It highlights the importance of understanding tumour-immune interactions in their full biological context, and explores current thinking on how to reshape the immune landscape of solid tumours. By addressing both immunological and physical barriers, future approaches may broaden the benefit of immunotherapy beyond its current scope, ultimately improving outcomes for patients with traditionally treatment-resistant cancers.

Indexed as

ImmunotherapyNeoplasmsHumansTumor MicroenvironmentImmunotherapyOn-target-off-tumour toxicityPersonalised medicineSolid tumoursTumour immunology

Identifiers

PMID41379722
PMCPMC12807497

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.