Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41380020›Full record

ArticleJMIR formative research2025

Radiomics-Based AI Model to Assist Clinicians in Intracranial Hemorrhage Diagnosis: External Validation Study.

Salita Angkurawaranon, Natipat Jitmahawong, Kittisak Unsrisong, Phattanun Thabarsa, Chakri Madla, Withawat Vuthiwong, Thanwa Sudsang, Chaisiri Angkurawaranon, Patrinee Traisathit, Papangkorn Inkeaw

Abstract readValidation Study
In one paragraph

Article in JMIR formative research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Salita AngkurawaranonDepartment of Radiology, Faculty of Medicine, Chiang Mai University, Chiang Mai, Thailand.ORCID 0000-0001-6211-5717
Natipat JitmahawongDepartment of Radiology, Faculty of Medicine, Chiang Mai University, Chiang Mai, Thailand.ORCID 0009-0001-0192-2387
Kittisak UnsrisongDepartment of Radiology, Faculty of Medicine, Chiang Mai University, Chiang Mai, Thailand.ORCID 0000-0001-8363-978X
Phattanun ThabarsaMaster's Degree Program in Data Science, Faculty of Engineering, Chiang Mai University, Chiang Mai, Thailand.ORCID 0009-0002-0193-9485
Chakri MadlaDepartment of Radiology, Faculty of Medicine, Chiang Mai University, Chiang Mai, Thailand.ORCID 0000-0002-3435-6369
Withawat VuthiwongDepartment of Radiology, Faculty of Medicine, Chiang Mai University, Chiang Mai, Thailand.ORCID 0000-0002-7531-7999
Thanwa SudsangDepartment of Radiology, Ramathibodi Hospital, Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand.ORCID 0009-0002-9821-4535
Chaisiri AngkurawaranonGlobal Health and Chronic Conditions Research Group, Chiang Mai University, Chiang Mai, Thailand.ORCID 0000-0003-4206-9164
Patrinee TraisathitDepartment of Statistics, Faculty of Science, Chiang Mai University, Chiang Mai, Thailand.ORCID 0000-0003-2918-1928
Papangkorn InkeawGlobal Health and Chronic Conditions Research Group, Chiang Mai University, Chiang Mai, Thailand.ORCID 0000-0002-3630-1564

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Early identification of the etiology of spontaneous intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH) could significantly contribute to planning a suitable treatment strategy. A notable radiomics-based artificial intelligence (AI) model for classifying causes of spontaneous ICH from brain computed tomography scans has been previously proposed. Objective: This study aimed to externally validate and assess the utility of this AI model. Methods: This study used 69 computed tomography scans from a separate cohort to evaluate the AI model's performance in classifying nontraumatic ICHs into primary, tumorous, and vascular malformation related. We also assessed the accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, and positive predictive value of clinicians, radiologists, and trainees in identifying the ICH causes before and after using the model's assistance. The performances were statistically analyzed by specialty and expertise levels. Results: The AI model achieved an overall accuracy of 0.65 in classifying the 3 causes of ICH. The model's assistance improved overall diagnostic performance, narrowing the gap between nonradiology and radiology groups, as well as between trainees and experts. The accuracy increased from 0.68 to 0.72, from 0.72 to 0.76, from 0.69 to 0.74, and from 0.72 to 0.75 for nonradiologists, radiologists, trainees, and specialists, respectively. With the model's support, radiology professionals demonstrated the highest accuracy, highlighting the model's potential to enhance diagnostic consistency across different levels. Conclusions: When applied to an external dataset, the accuracy of the AI model in categorizing spontaneous ICHs based on radiomics decreased. However, using the model as an assistant substantially improved the performance of all reader groups, including trainees and radiology and nonradiology specialists.

Indexed as

Artificial IntelligenceIntracranial HemorrhagesTomography, X-Ray ComputedAdultAgedFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedRadiomicsReproducibility of ResultsSensitivity and SpecificityAIAI-assisted decision-makingartificial intelligencebrain computed tomography scansbrain CT scansexternal validationradiomicsspontaneous intracranial hemorrhages

Identifiers

PMID41380020
PMCPMC12697913

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.