ArticleVision research2026
Distortion of perceived visual space after prolonged horizontal eccentric gaze holding.
Article in Vision research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Eye movements have long been used as a measure of underlying brain function and pathology. Specifically, rebound nystagmus has provided a behavioral window into the adaptive mechanisms of gaze holding. It is an eye movement aftereffect resulting from maintaining gaze eccentrically for a prolonged duration. Upon returning to central fixation, the eyes drift or "rebound" back toward the previously held gaze location, demonstrating an adaptive process. Little is known about how prolonged eccentric gaze holding, and the accompanying adaptation of the oculomotor system, influences the perception of visual space. Here, we used a variant of the landmark task to assess spatial bias (or lack thereof) with and without prior eccentric gaze holding. We found that perceived spatial bias after prolonged eccentric gaze holding was significantly different between gaze holding to the far left (-40 deg) and the far right (+40 deg). We also found that sensitivity in distinguishing relative distances between objects in space was marginally different between the left and right gaze holding conditions. This suggests that perceived visual space is differentially impacted by where gaze was previously held, reflecting a dependence on the history of eye positions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.