ArticleBMJ leader2025
Association of perceived leadership effectiveness and mental health symptoms in health system staff and faculty: a cross-sectional survey study.
Article in BMJ leader, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundWhile leadership effectiveness has been linked to occupational well-being among healthcare workers (HCWs), the relationship of specific leadership behaviours with mental health outcomes such as depression and anxiety remains less clear. To address this gap, we investigated associations between perceived effective leadership behaviours and symptoms of depression and anxiety in a large cohort of faculty and staff employed within an urban healthcare system.
methodsAnonymous online surveys were distributed to medical faculty and staff at a large urban healthcare system in New York City. The surveys included demographic questions, the Mayo Leadership Index to measure perceived leadership effectiveness and validated mental health assessments (Patient Health Questionnaire-2 (PHQ-2), Generalised Anxiety Disorder-2 (GAD-2)). Multinomial logistic regression was used to examine associations between leadership effectiveness (standardised as a z-score) and mental health outcomes.
resultsSurvey response rates were 26.1% (1482/5684) for staff and 43.5% (1635/3761) for faculty. The final sample with completed data included 2335 participants (62% above the age of 40, 45% White, 65% female; 46% staff and 54% faculty, including physicians/providers and researchers). Each SD increase in leadership index score was associated with 31% lower odds of anxiety (p<0.001), and 47% lower odds of comorbid depression and anxiety (p<0.001).
conclusionThese findings underscore the potential role of leadership effectiveness in the mental health of HCWs. Organisational strategies that strengthen leadership effectiveness may be critical components of broad efforts to enhance well-being and promote mental health in the healthcare workforce.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.