Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41382170›Full record

ArticleAlzheimer's research & therapy2025

Concurrent detection of cognitive impairment and amyloid positivity with a multimodal machine learning-enabled digital cognitive assessment.

Ali Jannati, Karl Thompson, Claudio Toro-Serey, Joyce Gomes-Osman, Russell E Banks, Connor Higgins, John Showalter, David Bates, Sean Tobyne, Alvaro Pascual-Leone

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Alzheimer's research & therapy, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Ali JannatiDepartment of Neurology, Harvard Medical School, 25 Shattuck Street, Boston, MA, 02115, USA. ajannati@linus.health.
Karl ThompsonLinus Health, Inc, 280 Summer Street, 10th Floor, Boston, MA, 02210, USA.
Claudio Toro-SereyLinus Health, Inc, 280 Summer Street, 10th Floor, Boston, MA, 02210, USA.
Joyce Gomes-OsmanDepartment of Neurology, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, 1600 NW 10th Avenue, Miami, FL, 33136, USA.
Russell E BanksDepartment of Communicative Sciences & Disorders, Michigan State University, 404 Wilson Rd, East Lansing, MI, 48824, USA.
Connor HigginsLinus Health, Inc, 280 Summer Street, 10th Floor, Boston, MA, 02210, USA.
John ShowalterLinus Health, Inc, 280 Summer Street, 10th Floor, Boston, MA, 02210, USA.
David BatesLinus Health, Inc, 280 Summer Street, 10th Floor, Boston, MA, 02210, USA.
Sean TobyneLinus Health, Inc, 280 Summer Street, 10th Floor, Boston, MA, 02210, USA.
Alvaro Pascual-LeoneDepartment of Neurology, Harvard Medical School, 25 Shattuck Street, Boston, MA, 02115, USA. apleone@hsl.harvard.edu.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundEarly identification of cognitive impairment and brain pathology associated with Alzheimer's disease (AD) is essential to maximize benefits from lifestyle interventions and emerging pharmacologic disease-modifying treatments (DMT). Digital cognitive assessments (DCAs) can quickly capture an array of metrics that can be used to train machine-learning (ML) models to concurrently evaluate different outcomes. DCAs have the potential to optimize clinical workflows and enable efficient assessment of cognitive function and the likelihood of a given underlying pathology.

methodsWe assessed the ability of a multimodal ML-enabled DCA, the Digital Clock and Recall (DCR), to concurrently estimate brain amyloid-beta (Aβ) status and detect cognitive impairment, as compared with traditional cognitive assessments, including the MMSE, RAVLT, a DCA, Cognivue

resultsAβ42/40, p-tau181, APS, and p-tau217 poorly classified cognitive impairment (AUCs: 0.61; 0.63; 0.63; 0.70, respectively), but accurately classified Aβ status (AUCs: 0.81; 0.78; 0.85, 0.89, respectively). MMSE, RAVLT, and Cognivue poorly classified Aβ status (AUCs: 0.70, 0.73, 0.70, respectively). However, separate multimodal, DCR-based ML classification models, run in parallel, accurately classified both cognitive impairment (AUC = 0.83) and Aβ-PET status (AUC = 0.81).

conclusionsDCAs that leverage digital technologies to generate advanced metrics, such as the DCR, enable accurate and efficient detection of cognitive impairment associated with AD pathology. They have the potential to empower health systems and primary care providers to help their patients make timely treatment decisions.

Indexed as

Alzheimer DiseaseAmyloid beta-PeptidesCognitive DysfunctionMachine LearningAgedAged, 80 and overBiomarkersBrainFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedNeuropsychological Teststau ProteinsAmyloid beta-PeptidesBiomarkerstau ProteinsAlzheimer’s diseaseBlood-based biomarkerDementiaDigital cognitive assessmentMachine learningMild cognitive impairmentPositron emission tomography

Identifiers

PMID41382170
PMCPMC12699934

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.