Evidence mapPaperPMID 41383153Full record

Trial reportPhysiotherapy research international : the journal for researchers and clinicians in physical therapy2026

Addition of Neuromuscular Electrical Stimulation, Based on the Level of Excitability, to an Intradialytic Twice-Weekly Cycling Protocol: A Randomized Trial.

Beatriz da Costa Ferreira, Clara Narcisa Silva Almeida, Daniel da Costa Torres, Rafaela Regina de Souza Torres, João Luiz Quaglioti Durigan, Saul Rassy Carneiro, Laura Maria Tomazi Neves

Abstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Physiotherapy research international : the journal for researchers and clinicians in physical therapy, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Addition of Neuromuscular Electrical Stimulation, Based on the Level of Excitability, to an Intradialytic Twice-Weekly Cycling Protocol: A Randomized Trial.Physiotherapy research international : the journal for researchers and clinicians in physical therapy · 2026
    Trial
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Beatriz da Costa FerreiraFaculty of Physiotherapy and Occupational Therapy, Federal University of Para, Belem, Para, Brazil.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2359-8346
Clara Narcisa Silva AlmeidaPostgraduate Program in Human Movement Sciences, Federal University of Para, Belem, Para, Brazil.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1340-6021
Daniel da Costa TorresDepartment of Physiotherapy, Cosmopolitan Faculty, Belem, Para, Brazil.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8820-1645
Rafaela Regina de Souza TorresFaculty of Physiotherapy and Occupational Therapy, Federal University of Para, Belem, Para, Brazil.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0579-2735
João Luiz Quaglioti DuriganLaboratory of Muscle and Tendon Plasticity, Graduate Program in Rehabilitation Sciences, University of Brasilia, Brasilia, Brazil.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7511-5289
Saul Rassy CarneiroPostgraduate Program in Human Movement Sciences, Federal University of Para, Belem, Para, Brazil.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6825-0239
Laura Maria Tomazi NevesPostgraduate Program in Human Movement Sciences, Federal University of Para, Belem, Para, Brazil.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3115-2571

Funding

Universidade Federal do Pará 23768.009471/2020-69
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

background and purposeNeuromuscular electrical stimulation (NMES) has shown promise as an adjunct or alternative to traditional training, but its optimal application in chronic kidney disease (CKD) population remains uncertain. This study aimed to compare the effects of the NMES intradialytic protocol combined with a traditional cycling on muscle strength and functional capacity in CKD patients.

methodsFourteen patients were randomly assigned to either the experimental group (cycling plus NMES) or the control group (cycling only). Treatments were administered twice weekly for 8 weeks. Primary outcomes included muscle strength (isometric manual dynamometry) and functional capacity (1-min sit-stand test). Secondary outcomes included neuromuscular excitability, respiratory muscle strength, and quality of life.

resultsAfter 8 weeks, repeated measures ANOVA showed no significant differences between the groups for any outcomes. DISCUSSION: This study demonstrated that NMES was not superior to the cycling protocol in terms of peripheral muscle strength, functional capacity, neuromuscular excitability, respiratory muscle strength, and quality of life.

Indexed as

BicyclingElectric Stimulation TherapyExercise TherapyMuscle StrengthRenal DialysisRenal Insufficiency, ChronicAdultAgedFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedQuality of LifeRespiratory MusclesTreatment Outcomechronic kidney diseaseintradyaliticneuromuscular electrical stimulation

Identifiers

PMID41383153
PMCPMC12699289

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.