ReviewAnnals of cardiothoracic surgery2025
Transcatheter mitral valve options for severe mitral annular calcification.
Review in Annals of cardiothoracic surgery, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Transcatheter mitral valve intervention (TMVI) has emerged as a potential alternative to surgery for patients with mitral annular calcification (MAC)-associated mitral valve disease, a population often deemed high-risk due to clinical and anatomic complexities. However, MAC also presents significant challenges to TMVI itself. In transcatheter edge-to-edge repair (TEER), procedural success may be limited by fibrotic and short leaflets, reduced mitral valve area, and subvalvular calcium protrusion. Transcatheter mitral valve replacement (TMVR) poses further anatomical hurdles, including a small, eccentric, or non-conforming annuli; insufficient MAC to ensure anchoring; narrow aortomitral angle; septal hypertrophy; elongated anterior mitral leaflet predisposing to left ventricular outflow tract (LVOT) obstruction; and heterogeneous MAC morphology leading to paravalvular leak or suboptimal fixation. Mechanical injury to adjacent structures such as the circumflex artery and atrioventricular groove is also a concern. Balloon-expandable valves, used off-label for TMVR, may be delivered via transapical, transfemoral, transseptal, or hybrid transatrial approaches. While early data show high mortality for valve-in-MAC (ViMAC) procedures, a shift toward transfemoral transseptal access has improved outcomes. The hybrid transatrial approach offers advantages including resection of the anterior leaflet, septal myectomy, and reinforcement of the valve skirt with Teflon felt. Among dedicated self-expanding TMVR systems, only Tendyne has both CE mark and US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approval and is delivered transapically. New transfemoral transseptal systems-such as Intrepid, AltaValve, and Cephea-are under active investigation. Techniques like LAMPOON (Laceration of the Anterior Mitral leaflet to Prevent Outflow ObstructioN) and BATMAN (Balloon-Assisted Translocation of the Mitral Anterior Leaflet) have been developed to mitigate the risk of fatal LVOT obstruction. Despite progress, mid-term mortality after ViMAC TMVR remains high. Continued innovations in technique, device design, and patient selection are critical to establishing TMVI as a viable treatment for MAC-associated mitral valve disease.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.