Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41383371›Full record

ReviewNeuroprotection (Chichester, England)2024

Rodent ischemic stroke models and their relevance in preclinical research.

Maria Thaysen, Emil Westi, Andrew N Clarkson, Petrine Wellendorph, Mie Kristensen

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Neuroprotection (Chichester, England), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Neuroprotective potential ofVeterinary world · 2026
    Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Maria ThaysenDepartment of Pharmacy, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences University of Copenhagen Copenhagen Denmark.
Emil WestiDepartment of Drug Design and Pharmacology, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences University of Copenhagen Copenhagen Denmark.
Andrew N ClarksonREGENBIO Consultants Limited Dunedin New Zealand.
Petrine WellendorphDepartment of Drug Design and Pharmacology, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences University of Copenhagen Copenhagen Denmark.
Mie KristensenDepartment of Pharmacy, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences University of Copenhagen Copenhagen Denmark.ORCID 0000-0002-4086-5266

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Stroke is a leading cause of death and disability worldwide, with ischemic stroke caused by an occluded vessel accounting for the majority of cases. Current treatments are limited to recanalization, either through thrombectomy or thrombolysis. Approved pharmacological interventions to suppress stroke-associated excitotoxicity and neuroinflammatory events, leading to brain tissue death, are still lacking. Although numerous preclinical studies have been performed, they have yet to be translated into clinically relevant interventions. First-line preclinical in vivo studies include the use of rodent ischemic stroke models, which vary in terms of how well they replicate human stroke pathophysiology and phenotype (including the formation of blood clot, blood-brain barrier disruption, neuroinflammation, and edema generation). Thus, rodent ischemic stroke models must be carefully chosen according to the specific pharmacological intervention to be tested. In this review, we aimed to provide an overview of the five most commonly used rodent ischemic stroke models and critically assess their advantages and limitations, with a primary focus on the acute phases of stroke.

Indexed as

animal modelsendothelin‐1 induced strokeexcitotoxicityischemic strokemiddle cerebral artery occlusionphotothrombotic strokethromboembolic stroke

Identifiers

PMID41383371
PMCPMC12486921

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.