ReviewNeuroprotection (Chichester, England)2025
Unravelling the nexus of stroke and dementia: Deciphering the role of secondary neurodegeneration in orchestrating cognitive decline.
Review in Neuroprotection (Chichester, England), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- PVT inhibition mitigates neuropathology and cognitive deficits in chronic cerebral hypoperfusion.iScience · 2026Article
- Caspase-1-mediated pyroptosis drives secondary thalamic neurodegeneration after focal cerebral infarction.Molecular biology reports · 2026Article
- Unravelling the nexus of stroke and dementia: Deciphering the role of secondary neurodegeneration in orchestrating cognitive decline.Neuroprotection (Chichester, England) · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Stroke is the leading cause of acquired disability. The development of acute ischemic stroke treatments, such as mechanical thrombectomy and tissue plasminogen activator, has resulted in more patients surviving the initial insult. However, long-term complications, such as post-stroke cognitive impairment (PSCI) and dementia (PSD), are at an all-time high. Notably, 80% of stroke survivors suffer from cognitive impairment, and a history of stroke doubles a patient's lifetime risk of developing dementia. A combination of greater life expectancy, an increase in the number of strokes in young individuals, and improved survival have inherently increased the number of years patients are living post-stroke, highlighting the critical need to understand the long-term effects of stroke, including how pathological changes in the brain might give rise to functional and behavioral changes in stroke survivors. Even with this increased risk of PSCI and PSD in stroke survivors, understanding of how the stroke itself develops into these conditions remains incomplete. Recently, secondary neurodegeneration (SND) following stroke has been linked with PSCI and PSD. SND is the degeneration of brain regions outside the original stroke site. Degeneration in these sites is thought to arise due to functional diaschisis with the infarct core; however, observation of SND pathology in multiple regions without direct connectivity to the stroke infarct suggests that the degeneration in these regions is likely more complex. Moreover, pathological hallmarks of dementia, such as a deposition of neurodegenerative proteins and iron, cell death, inflammation and blood-brain barrier alterations, have all been found in regions such as the thalamus, hippocampus, basal ganglia, amygdala and prefrontal cortex following stroke. Hence, in this review, we present the current understanding of PSCI and PSD in the context of SND and outline how remote anatomical and molecular changes may drive the development of these conditions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.