ArticleFrontiers in immunology2025
A machine learning algorithm to predict treatment effectiveness for Kawasaki disease in China: a retrospective model development and validation study.
Article in Frontiers in immunology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Machine Learning-Based Multidimensional Oximetry for Obstructive Sleep Apnea Screening: Development and External Validation.JMIR medical informatics · 2026Article
- Identifying the clinical signature of anti-centromere antibody-positive Sjögren's syndrome: a machine learning-based analysis of a multicenter cohort.Frontiers in immunology · 2026Article
- Predicting coronary artery lesions in patients with Kawasaki disease in China using a machine-learning algorithm: a retrospective cohort study.Frontiers in immunology · 2026Article
- A multicenter, clinically interpretable prediction model for malignancy risk in C-TIRADS 3-4 thyroid nodules.Frontiers in oncology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Kawasaki disease (KD) is the primary cause of acquired heart disease in children. Intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIG) is the first-line therapy for KD; however, IVIG resistance can occur. Reliable treatment efficacy prediction tools for Chinese patients are lacking, which this study aimed to address. Methods: This retrospective cohort study enrolled patients diagnosed with KD admitted to Shengjing Hospital of China Medical University and collected data on 36 demographic, clinical, and laboratory parameters. Least Absolute Shrinkage and Selection Operator (LASSO) regression was used to identify key predictive variables. The dataset was divided into training (70%) and validation (30%) sets. Ten models were trained through 10-fold cross-validation, and the training set data were balanced using the ROSE method for oversampling. The performance of each model was evaluated using the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC), sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy. Patients with KD admitted to Guangzhou Women and Children's Medical Centre, Guangzhou Medical University, between January 2023 and December 2024 were enrolled as an external validation cohort. Results: The CatBoost machine learning algorithm achieved the best comprehensive results (AUC: 0·960; sensitivity: 0·883; specificity: 0·889, and accuracy: 0·887). The internal validation results with CatBoost were AUC: 0·862; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0·6453-0·7651; sensitivity: 0·716; specificity: 0·877; and accuracy: 0·861. The external validation results were AUC: 0·834; 95% CI: 0·783-0·884; sensitivity: 0·817; specificity: 0·838, and accuracy: 0·835. Conclusions: We present a machine learning model that can predict the risk of IVIG non-responsiveness in patients with KD in China. This model may help doctors develop personalized treatment strategies, thus improving the prognosis of KD.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.