ReviewFrontiers in immunology2025
Immune-mediated mechanisms and maternal-fetal interface dysfunction in obstetric antiphospholipid syndrome.
Review in Frontiers in immunology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- Interplay between systemic immune-metabolic signatures and endometrial immune profiles in women with recurrent pregnancy loss.Naunyn-Schmiedeberg's archives of pharmacology · 2026Article
- Mesenchymal stem cells for recurrent miscarriage.Journal of translational medicine · 2026Review
- Human seminal plasma suppresses neutrophil antimicrobial functions and promotes bacterial survival.Frontiers in immunology · 2026Article
- Regulatory T cells in pregnancy disorders: a multi-dimensional framework for biomarkers and therapeutic strategies.Frontiers in immunology · 2026Review
- Animal models of antiphospholipid syndrome.Frontiers in immunology · 2026Review
- A review of the impact of isolated antiphospholipid antibody positivity on pregnancy outcomes and clinical management strategies.Frontiers in immunology · 2026Review
- The role of neutrophil extracellular traps in antiphospholipid syndrome.Frontiers in immunology · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Obstetric antiphospholipid syndrome (OAPS) is a complex autoimmune disorder that significantly compromises pregnancy, manifesting as recurrent miscarriage, stillbirth, placental insufficiency, and preeclampsia. Its increasing prevalence underscores the pressing need to elucidate its multifaceted pathogenic mechanisms to improve maternal and fetal outcomes. While traditionally attributed to thrombosis driven by antiphospholipid antibodies (aPL), emerging evidence indicates that OAPS can disrupt placental perfusion, impair trophoblast proliferation and invasion, and compromise placental angiogenesis even in the absence of overt thrombotic events. Beyond direct effects on trophoblasts and vascular remodeling, aPLs profoundly perturb the immune milieu at the maternal-fetal interface, encompassing complement activation, excessive formation of neutrophil extracellular traps (NETs), dysfunction of decidual natural killer cells and macrophages, and dysregulated B cell responses. These immune-mediated alterations collectively establish a sustained pro-inflammatory environment that undermines placental development and predisposes to adverse pregnancy outcomes. This review provides a comprehensive synthesis of the immunopathogenic mechanisms of OAPS that extend beyond thrombosis, and emphasizes the intricate crosstalk between immune cells and the complement-NET axis. A deeper understanding of these immune-mediated pathways may inform the development of targeted therapeutic strategies to optimize maternal and fetal outcomes in affected pregnancies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.