Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41384098›Full record

ArticleBio-protocol2025

Intraepidermal Nerve Fiber Quantification of the Mouse Hind Paw Footpads: A Detailed and Simplified Protocol.

Anastasia Yerushkin, Shani Berkowitz, Valery Golderman, Zehavit Goldberg, Yael Eshed-Eisenbach, Efrat Shavit-Stein, Amir Dori

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Bio-protocol, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Anastasia YerushkinDepartment of Neurology and Neurosurgery, Gray Faculty of Medical & Health Sciences, Tel-Aviv University, Tel-Aviv, Israel.
Shani BerkowitzDepartment of Neurology and Neurosurgery, Gray Faculty of Medical & Health Sciences, Tel-Aviv University, Tel-Aviv, Israel.
Valery GoldermanDepartment of Neurology, The Chaim Sheba Medical Center, Ramat Gan, Israel.
Zehavit GoldbergDepartment of Neurology, The Chaim Sheba Medical Center, Ramat Gan, Israel.
Yael Eshed-EisenbachDepartment of Molecular Cell Biology, The Weizmann Institute of Science, Rehovot, Israel.
Efrat Shavit-SteinDepartment of Neurology and Neurosurgery, Gray Faculty of Medical & Health Sciences, Tel-Aviv University, Tel-Aviv, Israel.
Amir DoriDepartment of Neurology and Neurosurgery, Gray Faculty of Medical & Health Sciences, Tel-Aviv University, Tel-Aviv, Israel.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Small fiber neuropathy (SFN) is an underdiagnosed condition characterized by sensory and autonomic dysfunction due to impairment of small nerve fibers in skin, blood vessels, and internal organs. Various underlying disorders are associated with SFN, and the pathophysiology of nerve fiber damage and functional impairment is the subject of extensive research. Diagnosis of SFN is challenging as standard electrodiagnostic techniques assess large fiber function and therefore are normal in SFN patients. The current gold standard for SFN diagnosis in humans is a skin biopsy, commonly obtained from the distal leg, hairy skin region, with evaluation of intraepidermal nerve fiber density (IENFD) using protein gene product 9.5 (PGP9.5) immunolabeling. While well-established in clinical practice, equivalent standardized, reproducible methods for assessing IENFD in experimental mouse models are lacking, which limits translational research in this field. Previous work in mice has relied on diverse antibodies, variable tissue sampling, and the use of confocal microscopy to trace nerve fibers. Other approaches have used chromogenic precipitate-based staining, which limits the ability to co-label multiple proteins. Here, we present a detailed, simple, and reproducible protocol for IENFD quantification of small nerves in the distal glabrous skin of the mouse hind paw. This protocol uses the two distal footpads, ensuring consistent sampling across animals. Prior to sectioning, the tissue is fixed and cryoprotected. Serial 20-μm sections are mounted on glass slides, dried, permeabilized, blocked, and immunostained with an anti-PGP9.5 monoclonal antibody, and then detected by binding secondary fluorescent-labeled antibodies. Although murine hairy skin analysis may apparently show a higher translational value, as it better reflects human biopsy sites, it is compromised by dense hair shafts and follicles, which interrupt epidermis continuity and thus interfere with sampling consistency. Polyneuropathy sensory symptoms, in fact, begin at the most distal sensory site, which is the glabrous skin of the toes. Thus, evaluation of this anatomical location best represents the clinical realm and may have the best sensitivity for identifying early axonal changes. In this protocol, we focused on IENFD quantification as done in human samples. Mechanoreceptors such as Meissner corpuscles are detectable and quantifiable by this method, and represent additional value since pressure-evoked pain, transmitted by these, is often reported by affected individuals. This immunolabeling protocol can be completed within one day [involving a small number of animals, where all three stages can be performed during a long working day (approximately 12 h)], while the entire workflow, including fixation and cryoprotection, is completed in up to 72 h. Importantly, the dermal and epidermal small fibers can be visualized using a standard fluorescence microscope, thereby avoiding the need for confocal imaging while maintaining high reproducibility. Preliminary validation in several animal models of inflammatory neuropathy and pain demonstrated a reproducible approximately 50% reduction in IENFD compared to controls, reaching statistical significance with n = 4 per group. This method supports SFN research and preclinical evaluation of novel therapeutics. Key features • Immunostaining protocol for visualizing small epidermal nerve fibers in mouse hind paw footpads. • Use of PGP9.5 labeling, with a monoclonal antibody that is used for human diagnostics, enabling translational comparability between mouse models and clinical studies. • Fluorescence microscopy analysis, without dependence on confocal imaging. • A rapid (12-72 h) and reproducible workflow for skin processing and intraepidermal nerve fiber quantification.

Indexed as

IENFD quantificationImmunofluorescenceIntraepidermal nerve fiber density (IENFD)Mouse modelNeuropathyPGP9.5SkinSmall fiber

Identifiers

PMID41384098
PMCPMC12689259

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.