Trial reportFrontiers in medicine2025
Comparison of the safety and efficacy of desflurane versus sevoflurane on postoperative cognitive function and early recovery quality in elderly orthopedic patients: a prospective, randomized controlled trial.
Trial report in Frontiers in medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Effects of Desflurane and Propofol General Anesthesia on Postoperative Recovery Quality in Elderly Patients Undergoing Spinal Surgery: A Randomized Non-Inferiority Trial.Drug design, development and therapy · 2026Trial
- Perioperative interventions in preventing postoperative delirium following orthopaedic surgery in the elderly: a Bayesian network meta-analysis.Journal of orthopaedic translation · 2026Review
- Desflurane combined with ciprofol or esketamine improves postoperative symptoms without compromising early neurocognitive recovery after intracranial aneurysm endovascular coiling.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: Desflurane is the most commonly suitable volatile anesthetic for elderly patients due to its low blood solubility, suggesting faster induction and awakening time. This study compared the safety and efficacy of desflurane versus sevoflurane in terms of postoperative cognitive function and early recovery quality in elderly orthopedic patients. Methods: Eighty elderly patients undergoing orthopedic surgery were included in this prospective, randomized controlled trial. After preoxygenation with a 5 L/min fresh oxygen flow via a facial mask for 5 min, anesthesia was induced using 0.2 μg/kg sufentanil, 1-2 mg/kg etomidate, and 0.2 mg/kg cisatracurium. General anesthesia was maintained through continuous infusion of remifentanil (0.05-0.20 μg/kg/min) and a sevoflurane expiratory concentration of 1-2% or desflurane 2-5%, in combination with air containing 40% oxygen to maintain bispectral index (BIS) values 40-60. Data collected included hemodynamic parameters, time to eye-opening, extubation, following commands, orientation, post-anesthesia care unit (PACU) length of stay, opioid consumption, patient and surgeon satisfaction scores, number of patients willing to repeat surgery with the same anesthesia regimen, and adverse events. Additionally, white blood cell counts, percentages of neutrophils and lymphocytes, and troponin I levels were recorded at baseline and 24 h post-surgery. Results: The Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) scores were lower at 1 h post-surgery in the desflurane group (D group) than in the sevoflurane group (S group), although the difference was not clinically significant ( Conclusion: Desflurane was not associated with reduced MMSE scores or postoperative respiratory complications. However, it demonstrated faster recovery times and higher patient satisfaction scores than sevoflurane. Clinical trial registration: ChiCTR2400093852.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.