ArticleInternational medical case reports journal2025
Rare Case of
Article in International medical case reports journal, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Aspergillus species are relatively rare and typically occur in immune compromised individuals such as those undergoing organ transplantation, chemotherapy, or long-term corticosteroid therapy. Renal Aspergillosis is an uncommon manifestation that generally occurs as part of a disseminated infection in immunocompromised patients. Case: A 22 yrs male patient came to emergency department of Manipal Teaching Hospital with the chief complaints of right flank pain, 3-4 episodes of vomiting for last 4 days, had acute onset, gradually progressive non-radiating aggravated pain and no history of any other medical conditions. His urine sample showed plenty of red blood cell in routine microscopy and other blood laboratory tests were within normal limit. Computed tomography of the kidneys, ureter and bladder showed multiple bilateral stones in both kidneys. Kidney stones were surgically removed by bilateral retrograde intrarenal surgery with total lithotripsy. After surgery, the renal calculi were received in microbiology laboratory for microbial analysis. The crushed material of renal stone was used for microbial culture and direct microscopy using 10% KOH wet mount which showed hyphae. Both bacterial culture media and Sabouraud's Dextrose Agar showed growth of molds which was identified as Aspergillus fumigatius. The patient was treated with voriconazole intravenously with the loading dose of 6mg/Kg IV 12 hourly for 2 days followed by 4mg/Kg 12 hourly for 7 days. After 7 days of treatment, patient recovered well. Post-operative follow-up and post-operative radiography did not show evidence of any recurrence. Conclusion: This rare case of fungal etiology in patient having renal stones reveals the importance of closely monitoring postoperative patients, even when typical infection risk factors are absent.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.