ReviewMaternal & child nutrition2026
Diagnosing Breastfeeding Difficulties: Where Do We Stand?
Review in Maternal & child nutrition, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Despite lactation being a natural occurrence in mammals, many structural barriers and individual factors can impact the ability of a woman to breastfeed her newborn. At the individual level, evidence has widely documented several risk factors and societal barriers for impaired lactation, many of which have been steeply increasing in human societies in the past few decades (e.g., psychosocial stress, metabolic disorders, births interventions, etc.). Yet the healthcare system worldwide does not seem to be prepared to support women facing such breastfeeding difficulties. Pregnant women are often provided with unrealistic expectations of how the breastfeeding experience should unfold, which can then translate into negative feelings when they encounter difficulties. In this context, the development of objective diagnostic tools able to help healthcare professionals and women identify breastfeeding difficulties that could then be treated accordingly would seem an ideal solution. Previous studies have tried to provide evidence for the use of milk compositional variations during early lactation as a tool to identify delayed secretory activation of the mammary gland, which often results in impaired lactation. However, despite portable technology for this purpose being successfully developed and/or validated, a consistent research gap remains around the true diagnostic power of such biomarkers in relation to clinically significant outcomes. This obstructs the development of effective diagnostic tools that could be employed in clinical practice to improve breastfeeding outcomes and breastfeeding rates.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.