Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41384982›Full record

ArticleBiomechanics and modeling in mechanobiology2025

A numerical framework for preprocedural prosthetic valve positioning and hemodynamic evaluation.

Jonas Lantz, Jeremy D Collins, Shuai Leng, Cynthia H McCollough, Anders Persson, Tino Ebbers

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Biomechanics and modeling in mechanobiology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Jonas LantzDepartment of Health, Medicine and Caring Sciences, Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden. Jonas.Lantz@liu.se.
Jeremy D CollinsDepartment of Radiology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.
Shuai LengDepartment of Radiology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.
Cynthia H McColloughDepartment of Radiology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.
Anders PerssonDepartment of Health, Medicine and Caring Sciences, Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden.
Tino EbbersDepartment of Health, Medicine and Caring Sciences, Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Aortic valve replacement is a cornerstone treatment for severe aortic valve diseases, including stenosis and regurgitation. Suboptimal valve seating can elevate the transvalvular pressure gradient, while valve orientation and size may produce flow jets that impinge on the ascending aorta, potentially weakening the vessel wall. Such hemodynamic complications can compromise valve performance and patient outcomes. This study presents a computational fluid dynamics framework, derived from medical CT images, for preprocedural hemodynamic assessment of aortic valve replacement. The framework minimizes user input and delivers rapid results, enabling efficient evaluation of valve types, orientations, and their hemodynamic impact. The results demonstrate that non-optimal implantation angles substantially increase pressure drop across the valve, thereby imposing higher workload on the heart. This automated and efficient simulation framework demonstrates strong potential for clinical application, supporting precise planning and execution of valve implantation procedures to improve patient care.

Indexed as

Heart Valve ProsthesisHeart Valve Prosthesis ImplantationHemodynamicsNumerical Analysis, Computer-AssistedAortic ValveComputer SimulationHumansHydrodynamicsModels, CardiovascularTomography, X-Ray ComputedAortic valve replacementCardiac CTComputational fluid dynamicsHemodynamicsMedical image-based modelingValve implantation planning

Identifiers

PMID41384982
PMCPMC12700954

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.