Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41384997›Full record

ReviewPlanta2025

Understanding chilling injury in postharvest produce: mechanisms, diagnosis, and mitigation strategies.

Tarangini Korumilli, Indiravadanan Kesavamoorthy, Puthiyapurayil Pranit Prashant, T Selva Kumar, K Jagajjanani Rao, Murugan Sevanan

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Planta, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Tarangini KorumilliDepartment of Biotechnology, Vel Tech Rangarajan Dr. Sagunthala R&D Institute of Science and Technology, Chennai, 600062, India.
Indiravadanan KesavamoorthyDivision of Biotechnology, Karunya Institute of Technology and Sciences (Deemed to be University), Coimbatore, Tamil Nadu, 641114, India.
Puthiyapurayil Pranit PrashantDivision of Biotechnology, Karunya Institute of Technology and Sciences (Deemed to be University), Coimbatore, Tamil Nadu, 641114, India.
T Selva KumarDepartment of Biotechnology, Vel Tech Rangarajan Dr. Sagunthala R&D Institute of Science and Technology, Chennai, 600062, India.
K Jagajjanani RaoDepartment of Biotechnology, Vel Tech Rangarajan Dr. Sagunthala R&D Institute of Science and Technology, Chennai, 600062, India. drjagajjananirao@veltech.edu.in.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9592-7655
Murugan SevananDivision of Biotechnology, Karunya Institute of Technology and Sciences (Deemed to be University), Coimbatore, Tamil Nadu, 641114, India. murugan@karunya.edu.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

MAIN

conclusionChilling injury severely threatens postharvest produce; integrating physical, chemical, biological, and genetic strategies with advanced diagnostics offers sustainable solutions to enhance cold tolerance, extend shelf life and ensure food security. Chilling injury, caused by exposure to suboptimal temperatures, leads to membrane damage, oxidative stress, and metabolic disruptions resulting in visible symptoms such as discoloration, pitting, and spoilage. This condition severely affects the quality, shelf life, and marketability of tropical and subtropical produce, posing significant challenges during storage and transportation. This review examines the underlying mechanisms of chilling injury, along with advancements in diagnosis and mitigation strategies. Diagnostic methods range from traditional visual inspections to modern tools such as spectroscopy, molecular biomarkers, and thermal imaging, enabling early detection of chilling injury. Mitigation strategies are classified into physical approaches (controlled storage conditions, preconditioning), chemical treatments (antioxidants, phytohormones), and biological interventions (genetic engineering, biostimulants). While these methods show promise, challenges such as scalability, crop-specific applicability, and universal effectiveness persist. Emerging molecular and genetic techniques offer potential solutions but require further validation and careful consideration of ecological and regulatory implications. By addressing existing gaps in research and practice, this review details the above stated approaches and emphasizes the importance of integrative approaches that combine physical, chemical, and biological strategies. Such comprehensive efforts are crucial for reducing postharvest losses, enhancing produce resilience, and promoting food security through sustainable agricultural practices.

Indexed as

Cold TemperatureFood Loss and WasteFood StorageFruitVegetablesFood Loss and WasteBiomarkersCellular stressCoatingsMembrane damageOxidationPostharvest loss

Identifiers

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.