ReviewBlood research2025
Invasive fungal infections in hematologic diseases: evidence, challenges, and clinical practice.
Review in Blood research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Patients with acute leukemia, particularly those undergoing allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation, are at a high risk of contracting invasive fungal infections (IFIs). These IFIs substantially increase morbidity and mortality. Over the past decade, the paradigm of IFI management has shifted markedly, with an increased emphasis on prevention and treatment. Expanded use of antifungal agents and advances in novel therapies have prolonged survival in patients with hematologic malignancies. This progress also allows subsequent lines of chemotherapy to be administered while maintaining antifungal therapy once IFIs are controlled. However, these shifts have introduced new challenges, including a rising incidence of breakthrough infections despite prophylaxis, the emergence of infections caused by rare fungi, and growing concerns regarding azole resistance. Although Aspergillus species remain the predominant pathogens, infections by uncommon molds and yeasts are increasingly encountered. This phenomenon complicates the diagnosis and necessitates diagnostic tools beyond galactomannan testing alone. Integration of novel biomarkers and antifungal susceptibility testing is essential for timely and accurate diagnosis. Current guidelines provide relatively well-defined recommendations for the definitive management of invasive aspergillosis, candidiasis, and mucormycosis. Individualized care and multidisciplinary collaboration are essential to optimize patient outcomes. In addition to prevention, diagnosis, and treatment, a deeper understanding of host immunity and its interactions with IFIs is critical for improving patient outcomes and guiding the next generation of management strategies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.