GuidelineRespiration; international review of thoracic diseases2025
Diagnosis and Treatment of Adult Patients with Cough.
Guideline in Respiration; international review of thoracic diseases, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This is the 4th edition of the Cough Guidelines of the German Respiratory Society (DGP), written by and for respiratory, internal medicine, allergy, ear-nose-throat, gastroenterology specialists, speech therapists, and physiotherapists. In a modified Delphi process, the authors developed 12 key questions on classification, common causes of acute, subacute, and chronic cough: both as a symptom of respiratory diseases including the upper airways, reflux, and drug-related cough, and as a primary disease, i.e., unexplained chronic cough and refractory chronic cough due to hypersensitivity of the cough reflex. An in-person guideline conference followed to find evidence-based answers and recommendations, which were graded as strong, weak, or insufficient evidence for recommendation. A brief scientific background to the respective questions was then compiled by expert groups of authors. Diagnostic algorithms were created for acute, subacute, and chronic cough and reflux-related cough. The significantly reduced scope and improved overview make it easy to use it in daily practice. The guideline is available in digital form as a smartphone application (currently only in German): <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://www.leila.de/de/" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">https://www.leila.de/de/</ext-link>.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.