ArticlePloS one2025
Investigation of the effect and mechanisms of moxa smoke in the treatment of Influenza A Virus (IAV) infection.
Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Construction of a reverse genetics and fluorescent reporter system for a bovine enterovirus isolated from cattle with diarrhea.BMC veterinary research · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Influenza, primarily caused by the Influenza A virus, is a highly contagious respiratory disease. While moxa burning is a traditional method used to reduce respiratory infections, most studies have focused on the components of moxa and air disinfection, often neglecting the pharmacological effects and mechanisms of moxa smoke. This study aimed to explore the antiviral and anti-inflammatory effects of moxa smoke in vivo, as well as the underlying mechanisms involved. Utilizing multiple databases, we identified 52 components of moxa smoke that target 384 proteins, with 92 of these potentially linked to protection against H1N1. Network analysis conducted using Cytoscape revealed 16 core targets, including PPARG and STAT3. We performed molecular docking to verify the stable binding affinities of core compounds with their corresponding targets. In vivo experiments demonstrated that moxa smoke significantly decreased the number of inflammatory cells in bronchoalveolar lavage fluid (BALF), lowered the levels of H1N1 nucleoprotein (H1N1NP), and reduced the mRNA expression of cytokines with chemokines in lung tissue, including Il-6, Il-1β, Tnf-α, Cxcl1, Cxcl2, Cxcl10 and Ccl2. These results suggest a reduction in lung inflammation in mice infected with the PR8 strain of the IAV. Western blot analysis indicated that moxa smoke upregulated PPARγ and reduced phosphorylated STAT3 levels. GW9662 inhibited the reduction of recruitment of inflammatory cells by moxa smoke, but didn't inhibit the reduction of viral load after moxa smoke treatment. A four-day treatment did not cause functional injury to the lungs, kidneys, or liver of H1N1-infected mice. However, after four weeks of exposure to moxa smoke, the mice exhibited changes in organ weight and pathological damage in the lungs and kidneys. In summary, Moxa smoke suppressed influenza virus-induced inflammatory cell infiltration by upregulating PPARγ, while simultaneously reducing viral load through PPARγ-independent mechanisms. Short-term exposure to moxa smoke did not cause significant impairment of pulmonary, hepatic or renal function; however, prolonged exposure may result in respiratory and renal dysfunction, potentially leading to more severe adverse effects.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.