Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41385588›Full record

ArticlePloS one2025

Blood RNA biomarkers and a point-of-care elastase assay for detecting host immune activation in suspected sepsis: Trajectory matters.

John E Lafleur, Eduard Shaykhinurov, John Perkins, Richard Wargowsky, Kevin Jaatinen, Mary Pasquale, Grace Holloway, David Yamane, Akhil Patel, Daniel King and 13 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

23 authors.

John E LafleurDepartment of Emergency Medicine, The George Washington University Medical Center, Washington, DC.
Eduard ShaykhinurovDepartment of Anesthesiology and Critical Care Medicine, The George Washington University Medical Center, Washington, DC.
John PerkinsDepartment of Medicine, Division of Genomic Medicine, The George Washington University Medical Center, Washington, DC.
Richard WargowskyDepartment of Medicine, Division of Genomic Medicine, The George Washington University Medical Center, Washington, DC.
Kevin JaatinenDepartment of Medicine, Division of Genomic Medicine, The George Washington University Medical Center, Washington, DC.
Mary PasqualeDepartment of Medicine, Division of Genomic Medicine, The George Washington University Medical Center, Washington, DC.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0258-7194
Grace HollowayDepartment of Medicine, Division of Genomic Medicine, The George Washington University Medical Center, Washington, DC.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0006-0823-5076
David YamaneDepartment of Emergency Medicine, The George Washington University Medical Center, Washington, DC.
Akhil PatelDepartment of Anesthesiology and Critical Care Medicine, The George Washington University Medical Center, Washington, DC.
Daniel KingDepartment of Anesthesiology and Critical Care Medicine, The George Washington University Medical Center, Washington, DC.
Andrew MeltzerDepartment of Emergency Medicine, The George Washington University Medical Center, Washington, DC.
Ryan HeidishDepartment of Emergency Medicine, The George Washington University Medical Center, Washington, DC.
Soroush ShahamatdarDepartment of Emergency Medicine, The George Washington University Medical Center, Washington, DC.
Aditya LoganathanDepartment of Emergency Medicine, The George Washington University Medical Center, Washington, DC.
Tarun LoganathanDepartment of Emergency Medicine, The George Washington University Medical Center, Washington, DC.
Taylor BoldenDepartment of Emergency Medicine, The George Washington University Medical Center, Washington, DC.
Michael Zane HaydenDepartment of Medicine, Division of Genomic Medicine, The George Washington University Medical Center, Washington, DC.
Aditya MaddaliDepartment of Medicine, The George Washington University Medical Center, Washington, District of Columbia.
Jennifer GoldmanDepartment of Medicine, Division of Genomic Medicine, The George Washington University Medical Center, Washington, DC.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2651-8767
Zachary FalkDepartment of Medicine, Division of Genomic Medicine, The George Washington University Medical Center, Washington, DC.
Tisha JepsonDepartment of Medicine, Division of Genomic Medicine, The George Washington University Medical Center, Washington, DC.
Avery LeagueDepartment of Medicine, Division of Genomic Medicine, The George Washington University Medical Center, Washington, DC.
Timothy A McCaffreyDepartment of Medicine, Division of Genomic Medicine, The George Washington University Medical Center, Washington, DC.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4648-7833

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introduction/hypothesisThe chances of survival from sepsis are improved by early diagnosis and treatment. In the prospective SENSOR study, RNA biomarkers of innate immune neutrophil activation were examined in emergency department (ED) patients triggering an automated sepsis alert. We hypothesized that higher levels of blood RNA biomarkers related to neutrophil activation would be associated with progression to more severe forms of sepsis.

methodsAdult patients in the ED triggering a sepsis alert were consented, enrolled, and study samples were obtained during the ED visit. Additionally, study samples were collected from a convenience sample of 16 adult non-ED controls and 8 other adults with self-described infectious illnesses. Blood samples were drawn in RNA preservative (Tempus) and whole blood RNA was analyzed by droplet digital PCR (ddPCR) for RNA transcripts related to neutrophil response to infection by bacterial (DEFA1; ALPL, IL8RB/CXCR2), and viral (IFI27, RSAD2) pathogens. Bacterial burden in blood was quantitated by ddPCR of 16S ribosomal DNA. Separately, neutrophil elastase was measured in immunomagnetically captured CD66b+ neutrophils by a novel point-of-care device.

resultsPatients were grouped using both 'Sepsis-2' SIRS criteria, adjudicated by independent physicians, and 'Sepsis-3' criteria which uses a qSOFA score for categorizing the severity of illness. Across 72 enrolled sepsis alert patients, 62.5% showed positive RNA biomarkers for bacterial infection, and 8.3% were positive for viral markers, with only 2 cases that showed only a viral signal. Septic patients showed a 4-fold increase in RNA markers vs. those without infection (p < 0.05). However, no significant differences were observed in RNA levels between those with sepsis vs those with more severe forms of sepsis. Likewise, RNA biomarker levels did not discriminate patients with qSOFA≥2 from qSOFA = 1. In a subset of patients with zero and three hour blood samples (n = 27) it was found that changes in RNA levels (up or down), or neutrophil elastase activity, was strongly associated with progression to more severe forms of sepsis or a qSOFA score of ≥2.

conclusionsPatients progressing to more severe forms of sepsis did not have higher absolute levels of neutrophil activation RNA biomarkers (or higher bacterial burden in blood) compared to patients with sepsis. However, a change in RNA biomarkers or elastase between zero and three hours was strongly indicative of progression to more severe forms of sepsis.

Indexed as

Leukocyte ElastasePoint-of-Care SystemsRNASepsisAdultAgedBiomarkersEmergency Service, HospitalFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedNeutrophil ActivationNeutrophilsProspective StudiesBiomarkersLeukocyte ElastaseRNA

Identifiers

PMID41385588
PMCPMC12700442

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.