ArticleJournal of medical Internet research2025
Lumbar Acceleration Gait Estimation: "Step-by-Step" Algorithm Updates and Improvements.
Article in Journal of medical Internet research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- A Head-to-Head Comparison of Three Literature Algorithms for Physical Activity Endpoints from a Wrist Accelerometer in Free-Living Conditions.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundDigital health technologies, such as accelerometry, offer low participant burden and provide quantitative metrics with ease of deployment, making them increasingly popular for gait monitoring. Remote gait monitoring delivers quantifiable, continuous health measures over extended periods, surpassing the limited insights from single clinic or laboratory visits and offering a more comprehensive health perspective. Numerous gait algorithm implementations, inspired by prior research, aim to standardize these metrics across devices. The SciKit Digital Health (SKDH) package exemplifies this as a device-agnostic framework.
objectiveThis study introduces a series of literature-informed enhancements to the SKDH gait algorithm, improving its performance against reference standards and reducing the need for manual parameter adjustments across diverse populations.
methodsA block-wise refinement process was undertaken, examining each algorithmic component for potential enhancements and evaluating their cumulative impact on the complete gait algorithm and the metrics generated.
resultsUsing data from healthy adult and pediatric participants, the novel gait event estimation method reduced the mean absolute error by more than 50% compared with its predecessor. Following the updates, the intraclass correlation values for final gait metric concordance with the in-laboratory reference improved markedly, from 0.50-0.74 to 0.81-0.90. Additionally, the systematic bias observed in the previous version's gait speed estimation was rectified, narrowing the difference from the reference from 0.065-0.230 to 0.00-0.03 m/s.
conclusionsThe findings from this study provide robust evidence supporting the validity of the enhancements made to the gait algorithm. They demonstrate that a single lumbar accelerometer can capture gait characteristics with high accuracy and reliability across various speeds and age groups.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.