ReviewCell2025
The neutrophil collective.
Review in Cell, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- New Immunological Insights into Bisphosphonate-Related Osteonecrosis of the Jaw: A Multidimensional Reappraisal from Molecular Switches to Clinical Phenotypes.Current issues in molecular biology · 2026Review
- The protein tyrosine phosphatase CD45 promotes PMN transepithelial migration, antimicrobial function, and colonic mucosal repair.JCI insight · 2026Article
- The controversial interplay between hyperinflammation and immunosenescence in elderly critically ill co-infected patients.BMC geriatrics · 2026Article
- Endogenous living adjuvants for cancer vaccination: Concepts, mechanisms, and design principles.Materials today. Bio · 2026Article
- Hijacking emergency granulopoiesis: Neutrophil ontogeny and reprogramming in cancer.Molecular oncology · 2026Review
- Circadian immunoregulation in cutaneous wound healing: from immune cell temporal heterogeneity to chronotherapeutic strategies.Frontiers in immunology · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
More than a century after their discovery, neutrophils continue to puzzle immunologists. Their remarkable migratory, cytotoxic, phagocytic, and degranulating capacities gave rise to the traditional perception that they are dedicated microbe hunters. Yet neutrophils possess an equally exceptional ability to acquire new traits across different environments, and when considered as a lineage collective, they are long-lived, reprogrammable, and retain memory of past insults. Here, we focus on the concept of the collective to make sense of both traditional properties and those that challenge existing dogmas. We model the structure of the collective as the combination of two biologically distinct compartments and discuss the unique properties that emerge beyond the sum of the individual cells. We hope that our review will stimulate discussion and spark new ideas about how neutrophils contribute to and can be exploited to promote health.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.