Trial reportDiabetes, obesity & metabolism2026
Efficacy and hypoglycaemia outcomes of once-weekly insulin icodec versus once-daily basal insulin comparators across baseline HbA1c, BMI and duration of type 2 diabetes subgroups: A post hoc analysis of ONWARDS 1-5.
Trial report in Diabetes, obesity & metabolism, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
aimsThis post hoc analysis assessed efficacy and hypoglycaemia outcomes of once-weekly insulin icodec (icodec) versus once-daily (OD) basal insulin comparators across different baseline glycated haemoglobin (HbA1c), body mass index (BMI) and type 2 diabetes (T2D) duration subgroups using data from five phase 3a trials of icodec in adults with T2D. MATERIALS AND
methodsTreatment outcomes were assessed, by trial, in insulin-naive (ONWARDS 1, 3 and 5) and insulin-experienced (ONWARDS 2 and 4) adults across baseline HbA1c (≤8%, >8% to ≤9% and >9%), baseline BMI (<25 kg/m
resultsAcross trials, the estimated treatment differences for change in HbA1c and odds ratios for achievement of HbA1c <7% without clinically significant or severe hypoglycaemia between icodec and OD basal insulin comparators were overall consistent across baseline HbA1c, BMI and T2D duration subgroups; no statistically significant treatment by subgroup interactions were seen. Hypoglycaemia rates were numerically low for both treatment arms and consistent across subgroups in ONWARDS 1-3 and 5.
conclusionsThe efficacy and hypoglycaemia profile of icodec versus OD basal insulin comparators was overall consistent across trial populations irrespective of baseline HbA1c, BMI or T2D duration.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.